Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is argued that the average level of public health is likely to decline in the future. I strongly disagree with this viewpoint, as I believe that advancements in technology and the increasing focus on producing healthier food will contribute to enhancing people's health standards.
Apart from this, science can solve global climate change. When a country face any kind of weather issue that time by using some technology they can find out this solution easily. For instance, most of the countries they also used this types of technology like weather checking machine. In addition, science can boost our education system. This is because whenever we face any problem we can attend our classes by online and also we can access a number of online site for our study porpoise. Consequently, we can get a number of advantages from science.
There are several reasons why improving people lives is essential. To commence with, one of the main reason is that medical advancement. Science has greatly improve healthcare and increased life acceptance. For example, many hospitals has advance treatment facilities such as CT scan, X ray machine . Moreover, another reason is that better living standards. In another words, science provide a lot of offer leaving a good life like transportation and communication system, people can connect easily to another person its not distance.
To sum up, as far as my explanation is concerned regarding this issue, I would like to restate my position that science should improve people lives. I believe the arguments i have mentioned able emphasize my view strongly, and therefor, no further discussion is necessary.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by discussing the role of science in improving lives. However, the introduction is slightly off-topic, as it focuses on 'public health' rather than the broader scope of the prompt. While the essay provides relevant ideas such as medical advancements and communication, the development is somewhat superficial. The arguments are presented as a list of points rather than a cohesive, well-supported discussion. The conclusion is a bit repetitive and does not fully synthesize the points made. To improve, ensure the introduction directly mirrors the prompt and provide more detailed examples to support each main point.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay is organized into paragraphs, but the logical progression between ideas is sometimes weak. While some cohesive devices are used, such as 'In addition' and 'To commence with', they are occasionally used mechanically or incorrectly. For instance, the transition 'Apart from this' at the start of the second paragraph does not logically follow the introduction. Referencing is sometimes unclear, and the flow between sentences is occasionally disjointed. Improving the use of linking words and ensuring that each paragraph has a clear, singular focus would enhance the overall coherence of the response.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task but lacks the precision and variety required for a higher band. There are several instances of awkward phrasing and word choice errors, such as 'life acceptance' instead of 'life expectancy' and 'study porpoise' instead of 'study purposes'. The range of vocabulary is somewhat limited, relying on basic terms. To achieve a higher score, you should aim to use more precise academic collocations and ensure that words are used in their correct context. Proofreading for spelling and word-form errors is also essential.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
The essay contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that occasionally impede clarity. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('most of the countries they also used', 'many hospitals has advance treatment') and incorrect verb tenses or forms ('science has greatly improve'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with comma usage. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors limits the score. Focusing on basic grammatical accuracy, such as subject-verb agreement and consistent tense usage, will significantly improve your writing.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.