Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued by some that the most significant aim of science subject should be enhance people's lives. I largerly agree with this statement as it improve people's health as well as advanced technological instruments are benefical for both academic and professional.

There are several reasons why individuals believe that science subject is play a crucial role for improve people's lives. One key reason is that, using of standard equipments make life more easier and conveninet. To be precise, if a person utilize the advance technological machines at workplace, it save a lot of time as well as products are mainly accurate form. For instance, in big companies, where the organization generate more revenues by using advance machines and these are avoiding the comman mistakes, which shown by handworkers. Apart from this, the standard instruments helps to student who studied at school or university grades. In other words, number of schools and colleges are installing advance instruments and equipments for students who build or gain some valuable lessons and skills from these types of equipments. Therefore, the most important goal of science should be improve the people's lives in quicker terms, generate higher productivity as well as in academic terms.

Furthermore, the subject of science should be assist in medical fields. To explain it further, many researchers introduced the some tools or instrumnets, which can lead to cure particular disease. A prime example, in many studies, researchers are proved that the specific cancer disorder are treating through the utilize of MRI or CT SCAN machines. That's why, if a person suffering from this disease, then the technological subject are useful for treatment as it listed out all the things in one subjects.

In conclusion, the subject of science that improve that people's lives in various terms, such as academic, workplace and medical field and these are beneficial on people's regular life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The student addresses all parts of the task, presenting a clear position agreeing with the statement. Ideas are extended and supported, focusing on workplace productivity, academic benefits, and medical advancements. For instance, the writer discusses how advanced machines reduce common mistakes compared to handworkers and explores medical applications like MRI and CT scans for treating specific disorders. However, there is a tendency to over-generalise in places, and some arguments are slightly repetitive or underdeveloped, such as the brief mention of academic advantages. Overall, the response meets the criteria for Band 6.0, as it addresses the prompt relevantly with clear supporting ideas, although greater depth and precision in development would be required for a higher band.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear paragraph structure, moving from a general introduction to specific body paragraphs covering workplace, education, and medicine, followed by a conclusion. Cohesive devices are used, such as 'To be precise', 'Apart from this', and 'Furthermore', but their application is sometimes mechanical or slightly inaccurate, as seen in phrases like 'That's why, if a person suffering from this disease, then the technological subject are useful'. Referencing is occasionally unclear, and transitions between sentences can feel abrupt. Paragraphing is present and logical, but the internal flow of ideas needs smoother connection to reach a higher band. Therefore, a band score of 6.0 is appropriate.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common items such as 'productivity', 'revenues', and 'researchers'. However, there are noticeable lexical inaccuracies and awkward word choices throughout the text, such as 'science subject' instead of 'science', 'technological machines' instead of 'technology', and 'comman mistakes'. Word formation errors are also present, such as 'I largerly agree' and 'benefical'. While these errors do not seriously impede communication, they reflect a limited control over word choice and spelling, placing the response firmly in the Band 5.0 to 5.5 range. A score of 5.5 is awarded as the vocabulary is minimally adequate for conveying the intended message.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, but attempts at complex structures are frequently faulty, leading to noticeable grammatical errors. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues ('science subject is play'), incorrect verb forms ('science should be assist'), and awkward phrasing ('the specific cancer disorder are treating through the utilize'). Punctuation is generally functional, but structural errors recur throughout the essay, causing some difficulty for the reader. While communication is not entirely obscured, the frequency of basic and complex grammatical mistakes prevents the response from reaching Band 6.0, making Band 5.0 a fair and accurate assessment.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.