Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It has been observed that science has play a crucial role in shaping the modern society. Some people believe that the primary objective of science should be for the betterment of people's life. I agree the given statement to a large extent. My inclination is further elaborated in the upcoming paragraphs.

The foremost argument to justify my stand is that many scientific discoveries will directly address serious human problems such as building dams on water falls to generate electricity from them, discoveries of antibiotics and vaccines etc. For instance, the discovery of Uranuim and Cobalt minerals which are very important and used for the treatment of many diseases such as cancer. Vaccines are also very important and act as a shield against many viruses and bacterias. In COVID science had discover the vaccine, that saves millions life against corona virus.

Furthermore, scientific development can improve people's quality of life. Modern techonologies such as wirelss communication systems, social media platforms such as instagram, whatsapp and youtube have changed the communication system and allow people to communicate with their family members around the world while sitting at their own homes. Moreover, scientific research had contributed to safer buildings, better agricultural methods and effective water treatment systems.

However, some scientific researches does not give instant results, but they are crucial. Such as the researches in the field of astronomy and space. They give knowledge about this world and solar system. In addition to this, they give information about many other things like how the earth came into existence and the astronomy of stars and other planets.

To conclude this discussion, it can be said that despite the fact of its slow progress in the field of astronomy, my points that how science will change the quality of people's life by providing modern communication systems and modern techonolgies in the field of mdicines are logically acceptable.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.5

The student addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position agreeing with the statement and supporting it with relevant arguments. The position is maintained throughout the essay. However, some ideas are slightly under-developed or contain factual inaccuracies, such as stating that Uranium and Cobalt minerals are used for cancer treatment, or that COVID-19 was discovered by science rather than the virus itself. Despite these minor conceptual confusions, the response covers the prompt well, providing examples related to healthcare, communication technology, and astronomy. The main arguments are extended and supported, fitting the Band 7 criteria for task response.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay presents a clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct focus, beginning with the introduction, moving into medical and technological arguments, acknowledging space research, and concluding appropriately. Cohesive devices such as 'Furthermore', 'Moreover', and 'However' are used, though some transitions feel slightly mechanical or repetitive, such as 'My inclination is further elaborated in the upcoming paragraphs'. Paragraphing is used sufficiently and appropriately, guiding the reader smoothly through the writer's line of thought.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common lexical items such as 'crucial role', 'betterment', 'antibiotics', and 'wireless communication systems'. However, there are notable lexical errors and inappropriate word choices throughout the text, such as 'techonolgies', 'wirelss', 'bacterias' (incorrect plural form), 'Uranuim' (spelling), and 'mdicines'. Some phrases are also slightly unnatural, such as 'science had discover the vaccine'. These vocabulary errors and spelling slips indicate a Band 6 level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some control over grammar. However, there are frequent grammatical errors that detract from accuracy, such as tense and agreement issues in 'science has play' instead of 'played', 'some scientific researches does not' instead of 'do not', and 'points that how science will change' instead of 'points about how'. Punctuation is generally acceptable, and while errors are present, they rarely impede overall communication, placing this response firmly in the Band 6 category.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.