Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-17
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In recent years, Science and its application become a vital part of our lives.Some people argue that the important aim to science should be for the improvement of human daily life. I strongly agree with this view that the main aim of this should be for the beneficial for people by providing them various facilities and benefits and making their lifestyle easier.
The primary reason why I agree with this view is that science innovation can provides basic facilites for human beings by providing them fast and less time consuming technologies. The various science technologies save our time by perfoming our daily task within less time instead of human spent more time.For example different type of reborts with advance operation may help in our dailyb life by replacing human duties and making their life easier. Consequently, basic role of science should be used for the improvement of human life style.
Another compelling reason why I agree with this staement because science technologies making our lives easier by perfoming difficult task within second . For example in medical feild, with the help of science it ios easy to dignose the disease with advance technologies and their treatment with the help of various advance equipment. That's why we focused on science knowledge for the betterment of our lives.
In conclusion. I strongly agree that the main aim of science should be focused of how we may improve our life by using science knowledge. This may help us by providing different facilities and technologies to solve our problem and help us to prevent our time and making our life more easier .
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear and consistent position agreeing that science's primary aim should be improving people's lives. The ideas are relevant, focusing on how technological and medical advancements save time and make daily routines easier. However, the development of these ideas tends to be repetitive and somewhat superficial. For instance, the concepts of saving time and making life easier are restated across multiple paragraphs without being significantly extended through deeper analysis or more varied concrete examples. While the writer does mention robots and medical diagnosis, these examples lack specific detail. Consequently, the task response sits comfortably at Band 6, as it addresses all parts of the task with relevant ideas, but these ideas remain under-developed.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is utilised to separate distinct points, such as general daily technologies versus medical advancements. However, the management of cohesive devices and logical progression reveals notable weaknesses. Phrases like 'Another compelling reason why I agree with this staement because' display awkward transitional phrasing and grammatical linking errors. Furthermore, referencing and cohesion within paragraphs can become mechanical and repetitive ('The primary reason why I agree...', 'Another compelling reason why I agree...'). While the overall flow remains understandable, the faulty cohesive devices and lack of sophisticated progression restrict the score to Band 5.5.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.0
The student demonstrates an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully attempting less common terms such as 'advancement', 'diagnosis', and 'beneficial'. However, there are frequent lexical inaccuracies, inappropriate word choices, and spelling errors throughout the text. Examples include 'science innovation' instead of 'scientific innovation', 'facilites' and 'reborts' (spelling errors), 'prevent our time' instead of 'save our time', and 'feild' instead of 'field'. Additionally, phrases like 'making our lives easier by perfoming difficult task within second' demonstrate noticeable limitations in collocation and word formation. Because these errors are frequent and occasionally cause slight confusion for the reader, the lexical resource is best evaluated at Band 5.0.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The essay attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but control over grammar is inconsistent. There are numerous basic and complex grammatical errors that recur throughout the response, including tense and agreement issues such as 'Science and its application become a vital part', missing articles ('in medical feild', 'with advance technologies'), and faulty subordinate clauses ('Another compelling reason why I agree with this staement because science technologies making our lives easier'). Punctuation and spacing issues are also present, such as 'In conclusion. I strongly agree'. While the meaning is generally communicated despite these frequent errors, the high density of structural inaccuracies prevents the response from reaching Band 6.0.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.