Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-22

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

There is no iota of doubt that a paradigm shift has been noticed in all domains of life. Owning to this the most significant of aim science should be to improve individual's lives.Well I whole heartidly accord with the statement and the related points and articulated in the following segment.

Fundamentally, the predominant factor evidently triggering toward this is observed here. Firsly, It is a fact that science always do inventions and research for making improvement in indiviuals live. Every scientific invention is made for convience for human. Sciene made things easy, however it depends on people to use these things in right or wrong way. For example- the invention of atomic energy is once made to use it energy as fuel. It invention was made to know about different matter which exits in nature, however it was human himself who made it a destructive weapon which has to many hazardous result which even not expected by scientists also.

Is there any supportive point also? Yes science

is. study which always tend make improvement in itself . It always want know and discover new things. In history every scientists do work or inventions in order to help human and make their life easy. The most of ancient scientists do not even patent of their product because they want their article easily accessible to everyone. To vindicate, a survey has been conducted by Dr. Richard Brown Professor of Oxford University,London which revealed that about 80% of individuals believed that It is fact that science always became helpful to individuals and made improvement in their lives in many ways.

To conclude, although it is kind of fact that science is always used to be do inventions in order to make human life easy yet its outcomes also depend upon its usage that who use it and in what way.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by discussing whether the main aim of science should be to improve human lives. The student clearly states a position ('I whole heartidly accord with the statement'). However, the development of ideas is somewhat limited and relies on sweeping generalisations and conversational asides, such as 'Is there any supportive point also?'. While the core idea that science should improve lives is explored through examples like atomic energy and medical research, the arguments lack rigorous academic extension. The conclusion briefly reiterates the stance. Overall, the response meets the baseline requirements for addressing all parts of the task, earning a Band 5.5.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response demonstrates some organisation with paragraph breaks dividing the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, progression is frequently disrupted by unusual conversational transitions ('Well I whole heartidly accord...', 'Is there any supportive point also? Yes science is. study...'). Cohesive devices are used awkwardly or inaccurately, and referencing is occasionally unclear. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal coherence within the paragraphs is hindered by abrupt shifts in focus and erratic punctuation. These structural and cohesive weaknesses place the response firmly in the Band 5.0 category.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is generally basic and repetitive, featuring frequent word choice and spelling errors (e.g., 'iota', 'Owning' instead of 'Owing', 'heartidly', 'indiviuals', 'convience', 'Sciene', 'exits'). While the student attempts some less common vocabulary such as 'paradigm shift', the high density of lexical inaccuracies ('to many hazardous result', 'always do inventions') causes strain for the reader. The range is limited and minimally adequate for expressing simple thoughts on the topic, corresponding to a Band 5.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 4.5

The response exhibits a very limited range of grammatical structures, and attempts at complex sentences are frequently faulty. There are persistent errors in basic grammar, subject-verb agreement, and tense usage, such as 'science always do inventions', 'It invention was made', and 'every scientists do work'. Punctuation is also problematic, with missing spaces after commas and periods, and broken sentence boundaries. These frequent errors cause difficulty for the reader and prevent the text from reaching a higher band, reflecting a Band 4.5 performance.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.