Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-22
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
In this contemporary era, scientific discoveries have not only made people's lives conveninet but also efficient.It is often observed that human's lives should be ameliorate by science which is paramount objective of it. I accord with this notion to a large extent. However,I will dicuss both the aspects in upcoming paragraphs.
On the one hand,there are ample of rationals why science is prominent in people lifetsyle.Fiist and foremost, scientific field develop medicines, vaccines as well as medical equipments owing to which assist to prevent and cure serious ailments such as liver, heart, kidneys related predicaments. As a result, it proliferates life expectancy and improves health.
Additionaly,with the assistance of science, the authorities as well as public can curb the dilemmas related to environment as it develops renewable energy resources like solar and wind power. It supports sustainable development which results in mitigates the pollution and protect natural resources in a productive manner.
On the other hand, not every science development provides an immediate benefit to the society. The primary concern behind it is that, due to the advancement of science reseraches, it puts adverse impact on wildlife because when they have to make any kind of medicines then they harm the innocent animals and utilizes them for their professional usage.As a consequence, natural life detrimentally effected and climate breakdown occurs
In conclusion, I restate that although advancements of science destroy the wildlife yet it is also beneficial for the treatment of serious diseases and tackle the problems releated to contamination
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0
The response addresses the prompt by discussing whether science should primarily aim to improve people's lives, expressing a clear position agreeing with the statement to a large extent. The writer includes relevant ideas in both body paragraphs, such as medical advancements and environmental benefits, while also acknowledging potential drawbacks like animal testing and ecological harm. However, some arguments are underdeveloped or overly generalized, such as the claim regarding wildlife and climate breakdown, which lacks specific elaboration. The conclusion attempts to summarize the points made, although the essay structure somewhat contradicts the original thesis statement by promising to discuss 'both aspects' in a way that suggests a neutral stance before taking a strong one. Overall, the performance aligns with the requirements of Band 6.0 as it addresses all parts of the task with relevant ideas.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with clear paragraphing, dividing the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion appropriately. Cohesive devices are employed to structure the response, such as 'On the one hand,' 'Additionaly,' and 'On the other hand.' However, referencing and cohesion are sometimes faulty or mechanical. For instance, typographical errors in transitional phrases like 'Fiist and foremost' and punctuation spacing issues disrupt the flow. Furthermore, the progression within paragraphs occasionally feels disjointed due to awkward phrasing and grammatical slips, which prevents the essay from achieving a higher band score. Logical organization is present, but the mechanics of cohesion require better control to meet the Band 6 descriptors effectively.
Lexical Resource — Band 6.0
The student attempts to use a range of less common vocabulary suited to the academic task, including terms such as 'contemporary era,' 'ameliorate,' 'paramount objective,' 'sustainable development,' and 'proliferates life expectancy.' However, there are noticeable word-choice and collocation errors throughout the text, such as 'conveninet' (convenient), 'human's lives' (human lives), 'ample of rationals' (ample rationale), and 'mitigates the pollution' (mitigate pollution). Spelling mistakes ('Fiist', 'Additionaly', 'reseraches', 'releated') also occur. While the vocabulary is adequate for the task and communicates meaning despite the inaccuracies, these frequent lexical errors place the performance firmly in the Band 6 category.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0
The writer demonstrates a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, attempting structures such as relative clauses and conditional-like constructions ('owing to which assist to prevent', 'when they have to make any kind of medicines then they harm'). However, grammatical accuracy is weak, with frequent errors in verb forms, subject-verb agreement, and prepositions. Examples include 'science should be to improve people's lives', 'human's lives should be ameliorate', 'it puts adverse impact', and 'natural life detrimentally effected'. Punctuation and spacing errors (e.g., missing spaces after periods and commas) are also prevalent. These errors occasionally cause difficulty for the reader and reflect a level consistent with a Band 5.0 due to the frequency of structural inaccuracies.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.