Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-09-28
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Yes i completely agree with this statement, that the most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. Technological advancements in science could help people to improve the quality of their lives.
People all around the world have a right to raise their voice to increase the science technology in their country. Governments also play a vital role in increasing the science advancements, and making them accessible to local people. This leads to an increase in economic development of the country, when every citizen would be able to use this technology. Daily life of the people should be made more accessible. Many acts can be performed to make people's lives easy and manageable.For instance, science can be utilized in treating different kinds of diseases, and making the operations safe and other surgical procedures safe.
Education also play a vital role to improve science tecnology for people. Science projects can help people in solving their problems and students can also take part in these projects. Research opportunities should be given to scientists and philosophers to discover various uses of science technology. This can bring many benefits to people lives. For instance, science technology should be used in biological research, and this can be beneficial for our nation as well as for our new generations. Governments should introduce various programs through which citizens can learn about the science fields, and can lead the change.
In conclusion, the science technology should be used to make people's lives better, and people should utilize these facilities in their daily lives, to improve the quality of life.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by clearly stating a position agreeing that the main aim of science should be to improve people's lives. The student provides relevant ideas regarding technological advancements, economic development, and educational applications. However, some arguments remain somewhat general and under-developed, lacking specific real-world examples beyond broad references to medical operations and biological research. While the prompt is addressed and a clear stance is maintained throughout, the depth of extension places this response comfortably at Band 6.0 according to the criteria.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear introduction and conclusion. Paragraphing is utilised, though some body paragraphs group distinct thoughts together rather than developing a single central theme. Cohesive devices such as 'For instance' and 'In conclusion' are used to connect ideas, but referencing and logical progression are occasionally mechanical or repetitive (e.g., the repeated reliance on 'science technology' and general transition markers). Consequently, the flow meets the requirements for a Band 6.0 performance.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary range for the task, successfully attempting less common items such as 'technological advancements', 'economic development', and 'accessible'. However, there are noticeable inaccuracies in word choice and collocation, such as 'increase the science technology' instead of 'advance scientific technology' or 'raise their voice' rather than 'advocate'. Repetition of phrases like 'science technology' restricts the lexical flexibility. The errors do not impede communication, supporting a Band 6.0 score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing relative clauses and conditional structures with varying success. There are several grammatical errors and awkward phrasing instances, such as 'Education also play a vital role' (subject-verb agreement error) and punctuation issues like missing spaces after periods (e.g., 'manageable.For instance'). However, the meaning is generally clear and these errors rarely impede communication, aligning well with the Band 6.0 descriptors.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.