Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-02
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
Nowadays, science and technology have most factors through change a group of individuals interest in daily task. Science should mainly focus improving people's lives. If questined I strongly agee with this viewpoint. My position is elaborated further with reasons and examples.
To begin with, the foremost benefit of improving people life expectancy through science. As much science has refined new medicines and , vaccines, medical tecnologies due to helping prevent disease and serious health issues. For example, many hospitals can detact diseas easily and faster through modern medical equipments. Moreover, science can provide natrual clean energy and better method of waste management.
Furthermore, scientific can innovation technogies for save time and efforts. This is terms of techonologies such as smartphones, computers as well as household machines make everyday task easiar and become more convineant. For instance. one major benefit for people to manage time balance as well as online banking allows to individuals to manage money without of visiting bank. on the other hand, some society can reduce pollution and protect natural environment such as planting tree, waste throw the garbage, and avoid plastic materials.
On the contrary, Scientific research also support and lead to new industries, jobs and business opportunities. As much as providing more jobs and product innovations because encouraging local community to improve their life and the major benefit for unemployment rates in the economy.
To conclusion, although there may be more advantages of science improvements of people's lives. My arguements clearly mention that science and modern technologies are become more better. They are not easy to improve but also eco-friendly.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
The response addresses all parts of the task, taking a clear stance on whether science should primarily aim to improve people's lives. Relevant ideas are presented, such as advancements in medical technology, life expectancy, clean energy, and time-saving innovations like online banking and smartphones. However, some ideas are under-developed or lack full elaboration. For example, the point about reducing pollution through planting trees and waste management is abrupt and lacks specific explanation or connection to the prompt. While the main position is clear throughout, the development of supporting arguments remains uneven, keeping the response at this level.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt to structure the response into introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Paragraphing is present, though the grouping of ideas within paragraphs can feel disjointed, such as switching abruptly from time-saving devices to environmental protection in the third paragraph. Cohesive devices are used, but they are sometimes mechanical or awkwardly placed, as seen with transitional phrases like 'To begin with', 'Moreover', and 'On the contrary', which do not always accurately signal the logical relationship between ideas. Referencing and progression between sentences occasionally lack smoothness, resulting in a somewhat choppy flow.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The writer uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting less common items such as 'life expectancy', 'innovations', and 'eco-friendly'. However, there are noticeable limitations and errors in word choice, collocation, and word formation, such as 'questined', 'agee', 'detact', 'diseas', 'technogies', and 'arguements'. Some phrases are unidiomatic or awkward, such as 'science can provide natrual clean energy' and 'science improvements of people's lives'. While these spelling and word-choice errors occur frequently, they do not entirely impede communication, as the general meaning remains understandable to the reader.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writing demonstrates a mix of simple and some complex sentence forms, though attempts at complex structures are often affected by grammatical errors. There are frequent issues with verb forms, subject-verb agreement, and articles, such as in 'science have most factors through change', 'scientific can innovation technogies for save time', and 'allows to individuals to manage money without of visiting bank'. Punctuation errors also appear, including misplaced commas and stray punctuation marks. Although these errors in grammar and punctuation are noticeable and persist throughout the text, they rarely completely impede communication.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.