Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-03
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The most essential target of science should be to improve people's lives. People nowadays use science in every field of their work. We can't go one day without the use of science. in this essay, I will discuss the pros and cons of science in our daily life.
If I discuss the advantages of science, then the pros of science is huge in our life. From waking up to going bed, we use technology in various factors. Such as, lights, mobile phone, refrigerator etc. Science has also improve our lifestyle so much. Now, we can talk to any person staying in any side of the world so easily, also we can work from home and earn money. To add more, people are using science to invent new medicines for the diseases which are hard to find out or to cure. Although, we use science for every single tasks we do. For example, we use electricity every single day and science played a vital role in making electricity.
although, science is so essential for us, yet people use science for many illegal tasks. Science has been used for hacking and copywriting works lately. Many terrorists are using technology using science to do illegal things. Also, there are many black hat hacker who are hacking without the government's constent, then people are doing copyright and plagirism.
to conclude, all the advantages and disadvantages, science is being used by people either ways. But, we should become more concerened about this and government should take further steps to remove the use of science illegally. Overall, science should only be used to upgrade our daily life.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by discussing the role of science in improving our lives, though it shifts focus toward the pros and cons of science rather than directly answering the extent of agreement with the statement. The position is visible in the introduction and conclusion, but the ideas remain limited and under-developed. For instance, the mention of how science improves lifestyles or deals with illnesses lacks detailed explanation and specific examples. Similarly, the discussion on illegal tasks mentions hacking and terrorism briefly without expanding on how these relate back to the central theme of science's primary aim. To reach a higher level, the writer needs to present a fully developed position with well-supported arguments and thorough exploration of all parts of the task.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
There is some organisation evident in the essay, with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression across the text. While basic cohesive devices such as 'To add more' and 'To conclude' are used, they are at times repetitive, inaccurate, or mechanical. Paragraphing is attempted, but the internal logical flow within paragraphs is occasionally disjointed, such as the abrupt transition between everyday appliances and illegal activities. Pronoun referencing and signposting need to be managed more effectively to ensure smooth connections between ideas throughout the entire response.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate to convey basic ideas about technology and daily life. The writer attempts some less common items such as 'essential target' and 'black hat hacker', but there are noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and spelling, such as 'constent' instead of 'consent', 'plagirism' instead of 'plagiarism', and 'concerened' instead of 'concerned'. These lexical inadequacies and spelling mistakes cause some minor difficulty for the reader. To improve, the writer should expand their lexical range, pay closer attention to word formation, and ensure accurate spelling of common academic and technical terms.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The essay displays a limited range of grammatical structures, relying mostly on simple sentences alongside a few faulty attempts at complex sentences. There are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation that can cause difficulty for the reader. Examples include subject-verb agreement issues such as 'science have also improve' and 'pros of science is huge', incorrect prepositions like 'going bed' and 'staying in any side of the world', and missing articles. Punctuation and sentence boundary errors are also present, such as lowercase beginnings after full stops ('in this essay', 'although', 'to conclude'). Greater control over basic grammar and a wider variety of accurate complex structures are needed.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.