Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Science has played the modern role in our society for many peoples lives which means alot. Scientist has change quite a lot technology in our society which helps a lot in our daily life and it improve our life in technology, healthcare and environment so i did agree with this statement.

Firstly, It helps a lot in healthcare because of science we don't need to check all problem with our hand science has develop many technology which helps quite alot in our society. Scientist has develop medicines. many kind of equipment for illness people which make our life healthier and we can live longer with the help of this medicines. Also with the help of science scientist can find many medicine of illness which help us to live longer than we thought.

secondly, nowadays technology has become quite alot famous in our culture. Like smartphone doe people it is part of our daily life to spend our time. Technology changes a lot in our society which is far better than our ancient time.The internet and transportation , internet allow us ti communicate with each other and we can go any places or countries with the help of transportation. technology has make our life easier and faster.

However, science can help solve environmental problems by developing renewable source of energy, such as solar and wind power.These envention can reduce population and protect planet for future generation. Science also has other propose like help us to study , learn about universe.

Conclusion , It means that science has improve quite a lot in people's lives with the helps of technology, environment and healthcare. Also it helps us gain more knowledge about universe.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the prompt by expressing a clear position of agreement regarding whether science should primarily improve lives. However, the development of ideas is limited and at times repetitive, which places the response at this level. While the writer mentions relevant areas such as healthcare, technology, and the environment, these points remain under-developed and lack specific, well-elaborated examples. For instance, the discussion on healthcare simply states that science develops medicines and equipment without exploring deeper impacts or providing a concrete scenario. Furthermore, the final paragraph touches on studying the universe, which slightly diverges from the main focus on improving human lives. To reach a higher standard, the writer needs to extend each main point with deeper explanations and concrete examples rather than general assertions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The text shows a basic attempt at organisation, using transition markers such as 'Firstly', 'secondly', and 'However' to separate paragraphs. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression, and the logical flow between sentences is frequently disrupted. Cohesive devices are often used inaccurately or repetitively, such as the constant reliance on phrases like 'helps a lot' or 'quite a lot'. Paragraphing is attempted, but the grouping of ideas lacks precision, with some sentences feeling disjointed from their paragraph's main theme. Pronoun referencing and substitution are also weak, leading to ambiguity in places. To improve, the writer should focus on creating smoother transitions between sentences and ensuring that each paragraph builds logically upon the previous one without relying on repetitive structural patterns.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is basic and limited, just barely adequate for the task. The writer relies heavily on simple and repetitive words, such as 'help', 'life', 'society', and 'technology'. There are noticeable lexical errors and awkward word choices throughout the text, including 'plays the modern role', 'illness people', 'reduce population' (intended to mean pollution), and 'other propose' (intended to mean purpose). Additionally, spelling and word-form issues occur, such as 'alot' and 'envention'. These errors cause some difficulty for the reader and prevent the vocabulary from being flexible or precise. To achieve a higher score, the writer must expand their vocabulary range, incorporate less common lexical items with correct collocations, and pay closer attention to word forms and spelling.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The grammatical range is quite limited, consisting mostly of simple and attempted complex sentences that contain frequent errors. The writer struggles with basic sentence structures, subject-verb agreement, and verb tenses, as seen in phrases like 'Scientist has change quite a lot' and 'science has develop'. Punctuation is also weak, with missing periods, comma splices, and erratic capitalization, such as starting sentences with lowercase letters like 'secondly' and 'Conclusion'. Attempts at complex structures are often faulty, leading to frequent errors that cause difficulty for the reader and obscure meaning in several places. To progress, the writer needs to demonstrate better control over basic grammatical forms, improve punctuation, and construct error-free complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.