Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The world around us is constantly changing,on a day to day basis new technology and techniques are being innovated. These inventions not only helps the world to evolve but has made the people's life farmore comfortable from a 100 years ago . while there are good factors some negative factors can also be experienced.

Firstly, the only priority science should have is imporving the livelyhood of the general population. The aim should be to be sustainable not only providing for the under privilaged but also to sustain the natural resources. Innovations such as solar panels, electric vehicles clean water and energy should be made accessible to the general public .One example in the real world is water wells in many dry places . Advancments should be a process of progressing all together while being helpful and kind towards one another .

On the contrary, the rapid growth in the technogical field has lead to the inventions of nuclear weapons which interm has lead to many unnecessary conflicts between countries for power, possibility and possession. Such events had happened in the past like the Ukrain russia war or even world war one and two and much more. These wars have directly and indirectly affected the lives of many groups and communities all around the globe .Thus it has become more hard to sustain families creating numerous problems.

In conclusion, yes science and innovation should be aimed at the betterment of the people ,while also not creating long term problems which will affect the general public.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses all parts of the task by discussing whether science should primarily aim to improve lives, presenting arguments both for and against. However, some ideas remain under-developed or general. For example, while the writer mentions solar panels and electric vehicles as sustainable innovations, this point is not fully extended with further explanation. Similarly, the counter-argument regarding nuclear weapons touches on historical conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war, but the link between these events and the broader scientific purpose is somewhat limited. To reach a higher level, the writer needs to expand on these main points with more detailed supporting examples and clearer elaboration throughout the body paragraphs.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays a coherent overall arrangement with a clear introduction and conclusion, as well as distinct body paragraphs marked by transitional phrases like 'Firstly' and 'On the contrary'. However, the progression of ideas is sometimes mechanical, and referencing is not always completely clear. For instance, the transition between sentences within the body paragraphs occasionally feels abrupt, and cohesive devices are somewhat basic or repetitive. To improve coherence and cohesion, the writer should ensure smoother logical links between sentences and use a wider variety of cohesive devices more flexibly to guide the reader effortlessly through the arguments.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common words and phrases such as 'sustainable', 'under-privileged', and 'livelyhood'. However, there are noticeable lexical errors, including spelling mistakes like 'imporving' and 'technogical', as well as word choice and collocation inaccuracies such as 'farmore' and 'more hard'. These errors do not heavily impede communication, but they restrict the score. To move up, the writer needs to demonstrate greater precision in word choice, improve spelling accuracy, and integrate a wider selection of natural, higher-level lexical items without relying on flawed forms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating some ability to construct compound and complex sentences such as 'Innovations such as solar panels, electric vehicles clean water and energy should be made accessible...'. However, there are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, and article usage, including run-on structures like comma splices ('...changing,on a day to day basis...'), missing articles ('...from a 100 years ago'), and faulty verb agreement or tense patterns. These errors occasionally cause some difficulty for the reader. To achieve a higher band, the writer must exercise better control over complex sentence structures, punctuation rules, and basic grammatical accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.