Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the modern world Science upgraded with so many outcomes which are useful for the people in various manners. There is discussion on that the most important goal of science should be to improve individuals lives. I largely agree with this view, and I firmly believe that science already helping people in various aspects.

The main reason is that the most important aim of science should be to improve people's lives. Because science has already change so many individuals lives in recent time. Science makes our life more easier, healthier and more comfortable. For example, many scientific research help people in health and medicine, food and agriculture. although there are many reaserach on science, some area still needs to improve. For instance, people have dieseas which are uncurable and science are researching on that and improving on that.

Another reason is that science brings many technologies. The trend of artificial intelligence nowadays changes too many perspective. Such as students now have smart study option like virtual reality and many buisness has improved through modern technology and in more creative way. For example, nowadays people use online meeting platforms for meetings and important talk. Moreover, science have made many innovative gadgets which are useful in our daily lives such as mobile phones, Washing machine, Television.

In contrast, there is many other reason to science should improve such as science discover many space related problems and solve them. For example, ISRO and NASA lunches many spacecraft to research on the space. These all helps to reasearch in various terms.

In conclusion, although science should do more research on various things, I believe that science most important aim should be to improve people's lives.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response successfully addresses all parts of the task, presenting a clear position throughout that science's primary goal should be to improve human lives. Relevant ideas are presented, such as healthcare advancements and technological innovations, and 10 words copied directly from the prompt were excluded from the official word count evaluation. However, some ideas are more fully developed than others. While the argument regarding health and technology contains examples, the counter-argument regarding space exploration in the fourth paragraph remains somewhat limited and under-developed, lacking deep extension. To reach a higher band, all main ideas would need to be equally well-elaborated with robust supporting details.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay demonstrates a coherent overall arrangement with a clear attempt to group ideas into paragraphs, beginning with an introduction, body paragraphs focusing on health and technology, a contrasting perspective, and a conclusion. However, cohesion is sometimes faulty or mechanical. The use of transitional phrases feels repetitive, such as starting multiple consecutive sentences with 'The main reason is that', 'Another reason is that', and 'In contrast'. Furthermore, referencing and logical progression occasionally falter, as seen in the abrupt transitions between sentences within the body paragraphs. To improve, the writer should employ a wider and more natural variety of cohesive devices and ensure smoother links between sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task and attempts less common items such as 'artificial intelligence', 'virtual reality', and 'innovative gadgets'. However, there are noticeable errors in word choice, word form, and spelling that reflect a limited and developing lexical control. Examples include 'Science upgraded with so many outcomes', 'individuals lives' instead of 'individuals' lives', 'reaserach', 'dieseas', 'uncurable', and 'lunches' instead of 'launches'. While these errors do not severely impede communication, they restrict the lexical score. To achieve a higher band, the writer needs to expand their vocabulary range, enhance precision in collocations, and eliminate spelling and word-form inaccuracies.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response displays a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, demonstrating an attempt to use subordination and varied structures. Nevertheless, there are frequent errors in grammar and punctuation throughout the text. Noticeable issues include subject-verb agreement and tense errors, such as 'science already helping', 'science has already change', 'many scientific research help', 'science are researching', and 'science have made'. Additionally, there are awkward phrasing patterns and article omissions. These errors mean that while communication is rarely completely blocked, control over complex structures remains inconsistent. To progress further, the writer must improve accuracy in verb formations, plurals, and basic sentence construction.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.