Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

There has been a continuous debate over many years that the most crucial aim of science should be to bring improvements in people's lives. I totally agree with this concept. All the progress world has made today is because of science and technology. Internet and artifical intelligence has converted the world into a global village.

Firstly, everyone on earth is dependent on science even from small tasks to biggest inventions. In everyday life, the machines, technology, instruments and appliances used are the result of science. It is very difficult to consider living a life without scientific instruments on daily nowadays. For Instance, cellular phones are used to connect and see the people living thousands of kilometers away from each other. Newly launched AI apps and websites have completely changed the planet. Therefore, I agree with this concept and believe that science can bring much more short-cuts and innovations in our lives and can change the living standards.

Secondaly, the world is very much dependant on science in recent years and that can lead to decrease in their mental and physical abilities. Digital machines can finish a task in minutes without human struggle. However, Frequent use of technology and internet can lead to destruction of physical well-being. The use of mental and physical abilities and experties to perfrom different tasks can foster the critical thinking.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that there are many drawbacks of using science but the advantages outcome them. In future, the scientists are planning to make wonderful inventions like time travel machines and micro cards that will hold the data of a person. All these innovations are for the humans and their future generations.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you “totally agree” that science should improve people’s lives, and the examples of phones and AI are relevant to this view. You also acknowledge a counterpoint by noting possible effects on physical and mental abilities. However, the discussion only partly develops the task: the second body paragraph focuses on risks of technology without explaining how this affects your view of science’s most important aim. The conclusion introduces speculative inventions such as time travel and “micro cards” rather than drawing together the reasons already discussed. To strengthen the response, explain why improving lives should take priority over other possible aims of science, and develop each example with a clear consequence for people’s well-being.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. Sequencing signals such as “Firstly,” “Secondaly,” and “In conclusion” help readers identify the stages of the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the second body paragraph moves from dependence on science to reduced abilities, then to the benefits of using human skills, without making the links between these points explicit. The repeated references to “this concept” and “science” also make cohesion somewhat mechanical. Some sentences, such as “The use of mental and physical abilities … can foster the critical thinking,” need a clearer connection to the paragraph’s main claim. Use more precise referencing and explain the relationship between each supporting point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “global village,” “scientific instruments,” “innovations,” and “living standards,” which helps communicate the subject. There are also attempts at less common expressions, but several choices or collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “short-cuts” for benefits of scientific progress and “advantages outcome them” in the conclusion. Spelling errors including “artifical,” “Secondaly,” “dependant,” and “experties” are noticeable and reduce the overall control of vocabulary. Some wording is also vague, for example “wonderful inventions.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and more specific terms: explain what an invention would do and how it would improve people’s lives, rather than relying on broad praise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a conditional construction in “It is very difficult to consider living a life without…” and a contrast introduced by “However.” Meaning is generally understandable, but errors in agreement, articles, and sentence construction occur across the response. For example, “Internet and artifical intelligence has converted” needs a plural verb, while “the critical thinking” uses an unnecessary article. The opening phrase “There has been a continuous debate over many years that…” is also not well formed; a construction such as “There has long been debate about whether…” would be clearer. Review subject–verb agreement and article use, and make sure longer sentences express one clear relationship between ideas.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.