Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

It is a argued by some people that science should improve the lives of individuals and it should be the significant purpose of science. I am completely agree with this statement because plays a vital role in today's life. In the following essay, I will give certain reasons of my agreement with some posible examples.

First of all, studying science is very common nowadays and if science students keep in mind the purpose of serving society after becoming doctors or engineers, it will be very beneficial for the people. However, the society can be served by many other ways like helping people in need or emergency situatons but science can do it more authentically.

Secondly, science should teach people what is wrong and right by teaching principals of life practically. For example, the government should include that topics in science study which can teach children the right way of living. In this way, the lives of people can be improved.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

Your position is stated clearly: “I am completely agree with this statement,” and you give two relevant reasons, including the potential contribution of doctors and engineers and the role of science education. However, the response addresses the question only partially. The reasons are brief and the examples are not sufficiently explained; for instance, the suggestion that science should teach “the right way of living” does not show specifically how this would improve people’s lives. The response also contains 160 words, below the required 250, so several parts of the argument remain undeveloped. To strengthen your response, explain how scientific research or practical applications improve health, safety, or living conditions, and support each point with a specific example.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction followed by two body paragraphs, and signposting such as “First of all” and “Secondly” helps identify the main points. The ideas are generally relevant and can be followed. However, progression is limited: each paragraph introduces a claim but moves on before explaining it, and the final paragraph does not provide a conclusion that restates your position. Some connections are also unclear, particularly the contrast introduced by “However” in the first body paragraph, where the relationship between other forms of service and science is not fully explained. Develop one main idea at a time, use linking phrases to show the precise relationship between claims, and add a brief concluding paragraph.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “science,” “society,” “doctors,” “engineers,” and “emergency situations,” which makes the subject clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “serving society” and “purpose of science.” However, the range is limited and some word choices or collocations are inaccurate or unclear, including “more authentically” and “topics in science study.” Spelling errors such as “posible” and “situatons” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise expressions that directly describe scientific benefits, such as medical research, public health, or technological advances. Check spelling carefully and choose collocations that sound natural in academic writing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional structure in “if science students keep in mind the purpose … it will be very beneficial.” However, errors occur frequently and sometimes make the sentences difficult to read. Examples include “It is a argued,” “I am completely agree,” and “because plays a vital role,” where articles, verb forms, or sentence structure are incorrect. The sentence beginning “For example, the government should include that topics” also has an unclear grammatical construction. Practise forming complete clauses, especially after conjunctions, and review subject–verb patterns, articles, and verb forms. Shorter, accurately controlled sentences would help make your ideas clearer before you attempt more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.