Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

In the contemporary world, science should improve individuals lifestyle has become a significant topic of discussion. While some people argue that scientific progress in humans life has numerous benefits, other believe it has negative impact. In my opinion the advantages of this developments clearly helpful for society in the future.

On the one hand, science have clear benefits to improve lifestyle. The primary advantage is that automation in every facility. This is because, automation help to reduce tasks human needs to complete in day to day life. For example, refrigerator is used in every house to increase the life shell of food which, decreased the food wastage happens due fungus. Due to increased life shell of food people can eat food at the time of dinner that reamining in lunch time. Also remote controlled fan helps individuals to offer less efferts when they want to start the fan. While seating on sofa, individual can switch on the fan with the help of remote without walking

On the other hand, certain drawbacks should not be ingnored. The major disadvantage is that excess use of mobile phones. In other words, long time screen scrolling can cause eye problems. For instances, many people are used to watch reels in late night, which affect on sleep cycle, also many eye infection such as redness in eye.

In conclusion, although there are some obivious disadvantages related to improvements in humans lives with the help of science, the positive aspects are much more significant. Therefore, I believe that science will continue to be beneficial for society in the future.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is broadly clear: you support science improving people’s lives and conclude that its benefits outweigh its drawbacks. The examples of food preservation and remote-controlled fans are relevant, and you also acknowledge a possible harm from mobile-phone use. However, the response only partly develops the central question of what science’s most important aim should be. Much of the support describes everyday convenience, while the counterargument is brief and does not explain how it affects your overall view. The opening also introduces a contrast between people’s views without clearly explaining your own position until the final sentence. To strengthen the response, state directly whether improving lives should be science’s primary aim, then develop and connect each example to that claim.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure, with an introduction, two contrasting body paragraphs and a conclusion. The signposts “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the broad direction. However, progression within paragraphs is less controlled: the first body paragraph moves from automation to food storage and then to a fan, without a clear explanation linking these examples to the main claim. Some connections are also mechanical or unclear, such as “This is because” followed by an incomplete explanation, and the final fan example ends abruptly. Organise each paragraph around one main point, explain the example’s relevance, and use clearer links between sentences rather than relying mainly on formulaic transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “scientific progress,” “automation,” “food wastage,” and “screen scrolling,” and the reader can generally identify the examples you intend. However, the range is limited and several inaccurate word choices or collocations make parts difficult to understand. For instance, “life shell of food” appears to mean “shelf life,” while “excess use” and “eye infection” do not express the intended ideas naturally in context. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “ingnored,” “obivious,” and “efferts.” Build a more precise set of phrases for discussing benefits and harms, and check spelling and collocations carefully so that your meaning is consistently clear.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a relative clause in “reels in late night, which affect on sleep cycle,” and you use basic linking structures to organise your points. However, grammatical control is inconsistent, and errors occur in many sentences. Examples include “science have clear benefits,” “automation help,” and “other believe,” where subject–verb agreement is incorrect. The opening phrase “science should improve individuals lifestyle has become” is also not formed as a complete, natural sentence, and several sentences omit articles or use unclear clause structures. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, articles and sentence boundaries first; then build longer sentences from a clear main clause and check that each added clause is grammatically complete.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.