Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays, science has important aim to improve the peoples live. Some people think that this is a very good idea while other do not support this idea. I completely agree with the statement and I will explain my reason below.

The first important reason why i support this idea is that science has already done many inventions which is helpful for human lives so this good that science important aim is to improve human lives more instaed of improveing lives of other living things. For example, In Pakistan, many people have seen positive changes because of this in thier daily lives. this clearly shows it is very useful and beneficial for people in society. Therefore most people now accept and start supporting this idea.

Another important reason is that science is always beneficial for us in every situation in life so its better they are trying to facilitate people and improving their lives more. Instance, students and working people have also benefited from this idea in many ways.This proves that it has a very positive effect on the lives of ordinary people. As a result, more and more people are now in favour of this idea everyday.

in conclusion, I strongly believe that this is a positive development for society. The two main reasons are that it is helpful for individuals and it also benefits the community as a whole. I hope that people will take advantage of this opportunity and use it in a positive way for a better future.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

Your position is clear: you state, “I completely agree,” and return to this view in the conclusion. You also give two reasons and attempt examples, which keeps the response relevant to the question. However, the reasons are broad and only partly explained. The claim that science is “beneficial for us in every situation” is not supported with a specific explanation, and the references to people in Pakistan, students, and working people do not identify particular scientific advances or show how they improve lives. The comparison with “other living things” is also introduced without being developed. To strengthen the response, explain each reason in detail and use concrete examples, such as medical treatment or safer transport, to show the benefits.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The paragraphs each focus on a reason, and signposts such as “The first important reason,” “Another important reason,” and “in conclusion” help readers follow the overall arrangement. However, progression within the body paragraphs is sometimes mechanical: similar claims about science being beneficial are repeated, while the examples do not clearly develop the points. Some references are unclear, particularly “this idea” and “this,” because the reader must infer which scientific development or benefit is meant. Build each paragraph around one specific claim, explain it, and then connect a concrete example to it. Vary linking expressions and make references explicit to improve cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the general argument, including “inventions,” “beneficial,” “positive changes,” and “ordinary people.” However, the range is limited and several phrases are repetitive or imprecise, such as “this idea,” “improve human lives,” and “positive effect.” Some word choices and collocations are unnatural, including “science has important aim,” “facilitate people,” and “Instance” where an example is being introduced. Spelling errors such as “instaed,” “thier,” and “everyday” also reduce accuracy. Aim for more precise language that names the scientific field or outcome, and check spelling and collocations carefully. This would make the argument clearer and more convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including a reason clause beginning “why” and a result clause introduced by “so.” However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences difficult to follow. For example, “science has already done many inventions which is helpful” has problems with verb choice, agreement, and clause structure; “other do not support” also has an agreement error. Articles and possessives are often missing or inaccurate, as in “science has important aim” and “the peoples live.” Sentence boundaries and capitalisation are inconsistent, particularly at the starts of “this clearly shows” and “in conclusion.” Practise accurate basic sentence patterns first, then add complex clauses while checking agreement, articles, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.