Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Some believed that the most imperative goal of since is to improve the lives of humanity. This essay strongly agrees with the statement because without humanity, science will simply not exist. Furthermore, science was created to help humans to live a longer life.

Science should give major significance towards human development to help the nation solve various societal problems like poverty and malnutrition. Science should allocate its efforts in achieving a better life for its subjects because without humans, science will not prevail and lived. Therefore, if science can't protect humanity then science will also cease to exist. In a recent study held in the Philippines, many government agencies are urging the young generation to venture in science discovery and become scientist in the near future.

Another rationale why the scientific field's most important aim should be improving the lives of its subjects is the fact that most triumphs of the field is measured by the number of lives it had saved and prolonged. Through thousands of vaccine discoveries and cures for millions of diseases, science helped the society to live better and expand the life expectancy of an individual. With that, science was given importance by the people which is why many students are wanting to join that certain field when they grow up to join science in prolonging the life of the inhabitants of earth. For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, discovered many treatment options for HIV and was celebrated by people around the world.

In conclusion, science greatest achievement is saving the existence of humans in this world, and how to give them more time to achieve great things while they are still alive, and that is enough reason for science to make improving people's wellbeing as their perpetual goal for the years to come.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you strongly agree that science should aim to improve human lives, and both body paragraphs give relevant reasons. The discussion of science addressing poverty and malnutrition, followed by vaccines and HIV treatments, responds to the topic and includes examples. However, some ideas are less fully explained than others. The claim that science would cease to exist without humanity is repeated but not clearly connected to why improving lives should be its most important aim. The Philippines example about encouraging young people to study science also needs a clearer link to the argument. Develop each point with a specific explanation of its impact, and briefly acknowledge other possible aims of science before explaining why human wellbeing should take priority.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting reasons, and a conclusion that restates your position. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore,” “Therefore,” and “For example” help signal relationships between ideas. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear. In the first body paragraph, the move from science addressing poverty and malnutrition to government agencies encouraging young people to enter science is abrupt; explain how this example supports the paragraph’s main point. The repeated claim that science depends on humanity also limits progression. In the second body paragraph, several ideas are packed into long sentences, making the relationship between scientific achievements, public recognition, and students’ career choices harder to follow. Use clearer topic sentences and develop one main line of reasoning in each paragraph.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “societal problems,” “malnutrition,” “vaccine discoveries,” and “life expectancy,” which helps communicate the subject. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “most imperative goal” and “perpetual goal.” However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “goal of since,” “significance towards human development,” “science discovery,” and “subjects” for people whose lives science affects. These choices sometimes make the intended meaning less precise. Spelling and word-form errors such as “scientist” where a plural is needed also reduce control. Aim for natural academic collocations and check that each word expresses the intended relationship, rather than choosing a formal-sounding phrase that does not fit.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including conditional clauses such as “if science can't protect humanity then science will also cease to exist” and a relative clause in “the number of lives it had saved and prolonged.” Most of the argument remains understandable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity and accuracy. For example, “most triumphs … is measured” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “science greatest achievement” needs a possessive form. The sentence beginning “Through thousands of vaccine discoveries” also shifts awkwardly between past and present forms (“helped” and “is why”). There are occasional issues with articles, plurals, and punctuation as well. Review agreement, possessives, and consistent tense, and break up long sentences where several clauses make the grammar difficult to control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.