Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

science paly extemely pivotal role in country, the most siginificant object of science to enhace the lives of people. I partly agree with this view because provide crucial benefits in society, but science should also focus on other experiemnts to develop the country.

To commence with one side, there are several reaons science ought to ameliorate living of life. Initially, science have substantial technology that can procure the indiviudals of their contry with which their life can be easy such as healthcare centres with predominantly features that can examine desease in great way and prevent them and forcasting the disease and making the antibiotics. For instace science provide a wheather forcast in mobilephones with the help of it people can see when may the chance of rain. Moreover, science should predict of natural disaster and inform the people of reduce the natural resources and prepare them to get ready for future if may anything has to be happenes in future. Furthermore, in medical and science school, univerisities rely on science so they should offer modern information and technology.

To explicate with other side, although science should develop people's life. They have predominant responsibility in enhancing the country such as making better communication, GPS navigate, forcasting wheather and agriculture. These science experiements make life easy by installing a hge satellites in space and other expoloration science assist nation to develop more in technology and competition with other countries. Therefore, science research and exploration should also prioritise towards the making the better.

conclusion, science provide technology to people, forcast of wheather and check their illnes in their home and also aware for natural storms, but science have also obligations of improve the country problems and intoduce the solutions of future issues. Thereofore, science should balanced between people live and developing the country this approach would beneficial.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You give a partly agreeing position in the introduction and return to a balanced conclusion, so the response addresses the central question. Relevant examples include healthcare, disease prediction, weather forecasts and disaster warnings. However, the argument is only partly developed: the second body paragraph shifts from improving people’s lives to developing the country, without explaining clearly how these aims differ or why exploration should receive priority. The point about universities and modern information is also introduced but not explained. To strengthen the response, state more precisely what other scientific aims matter and support each main claim with a clear explanation or example showing its benefit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion, and signposting such as “To commence with,” “Moreover” and “Furthermore” helps identify the stages of the argument. However, progression within and between paragraphs is not always clear. The first body paragraph moves quickly from healthcare to weather forecasts, disasters and universities, while the second repeats forecasting and communication without establishing a distinct line of reasoning. Some links are also awkward or unclear, particularly “To explicate with other side” and “Therefore” before the final claim. Organise each paragraph around one main point, explain it, and then connect it explicitly to your position rather than relying mainly on transition phrases.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “natural disaster,” “satellites,” “exploration” and “agriculture,” and the reader can generally identify your intended subject. However, spelling errors and inaccurate word choices are frequent enough to cause difficulty: examples include “paly,” “siginificant,” “experiemnts” and “wheather.” Several phrases are also unnatural or unclear, such as “ameliorate living of life,” “procure the individuals” and “making the better.” These problems limit precision even when the underlying idea is relevant. Focus on accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully; using simpler expressions such as “improve living standards” is more effective than attempting an unsuitable synonym.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some longer sentences and subordinate clauses, for example the sentence beginning “Moreover, science should predict of natural disaster,” but complex structures are often faulty, and many sentences contain errors that make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. Examples include “science have,” “science provide,” and “science should also obligations,” which show problems with subject–verb agreement and sentence construction. Articles and sentence boundaries are also inconsistent, as in “conclusion” at the start of the final paragraph and the long opening sentence of the first body paragraph. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then add clauses with clear subjects and verbs. Check agreement, articles and punctuation during revision.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.