Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 4.5)

there are many important ways of science to improve in people's lives. i will list the key points where science needs to work hard for importance of human lives: invention of human resources programs and changing lives with new raw materials.

before inventing in human resources, science needs to examine lives and what will transform our health to modern resources and by so doing, they will realise that the cause of many sickness in the world is poor planning or poor maintenance of life . government on the othe hands has a roles to play as regards to these improve in human lives by helping the masses to regulate and employ qualified individuals based on their different fields of studies or learning to help maintain lives by living proper checks on humman and finding solutions to it.

as regards to improve in human lives, the qualified professionals needs to make use of oir raw materials to produce quality drugs that can help to boost our lives and and make sure that the individual or the masses follow the the proper rood to save lives . invention of adequate machines or machinery for proper checks and proper monitoring because is not all about buying machines, we need also caring and good science workers who can be calm and make sure the main purpose him or her being employed to work in the society or the industry is to save lives .

the solutions to both reasons is proper monitoring of apex organization to the employees because, atimes, individual lost their lives due to poor management.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response is connected to the topic, particularly through references to medicines, health checks, machinery and monitoring, and it gives some reasons why science could benefit people. However, it only minimally answers the central question: it does not clearly state how far you agree or disagree that improving lives should be science’s most important aim. The discussion also shifts towards government hiring and workplace management, without explaining how these points relate to science’s priorities. Ideas such as producing quality drugs are relevant but remain general and are not supported with a specific example or explanation of their impact. State your position directly, then develop two focused reasons with clear examples showing why improving lives should—or should not—take priority over other scientific aims.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0

There is an attempt to organise the response into an introduction, two main sections and a concluding sentence, and phrases such as “before inventing” and “as regards to” signal relationships between ideas. However, the progression is difficult to follow because several different points—human resources, government roles, raw materials, machinery and employee monitoring—are combined without a clear central line of argument. The final sentence introduces “apex organization” and poor management but does not clearly conclude the discussion or restate a position. Some linking phrases are repeated, and references such as “these improve” and “it” are unclear. Use one paragraph for each main reason, connect each example explicitly to your argument, and finish with a concise conclusion.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “qualified professionals,” “raw materials,” “quality drugs,” “proper monitoring” and “solutions.” These choices show an attempt to discuss science and public health, but the range is basic and several phrases are imprecise or unnatural, which sometimes makes the intended meaning hard to identify. For example, “invention of human resources programs” does not clearly express a scientific aim, while “proper rood” appears to be an inaccurate word choice. Repetition of “proper,” “lives” and “improve” also limits precision. Build a more specific vocabulary for the topic—such as medical research, disease prevention and public health—and check collocations so that your wording communicates each idea clearly.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts some longer sentences, including the sentence beginning “before inventing in human resources,” and uses clauses to explain causes and purposes. However, control is inconsistent: errors in agreement, articles, verb forms and sentence construction occur frequently and sometimes obscure meaning. Examples include “many sickness,” “the qualified professionals needs,” “government … has a roles,” and “because is not all about buying machines.” Several sentences run together, and punctuation does not reliably separate complete ideas. Practise building accurate simple sentences first, then combine them with controlled clauses using “because,” “which” or “so that.” Check subject–verb agreement and singular/plural forms during editing, and use full stops to make each point easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.