Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Most significant goal of science is to improved the life of human`s lives. I entirely agree with this statement because every aspect and experiments will directly utilized by humans by taking assistance and performing individual specific tasks. Without science human cant survive however, if it possible ,while just for short term.

There are vast benefits provided by science invention and their only goal is to facilitates the society bu introducing new machinery and methadologies to make work effortless for people. For example, in past times people where name of science does not exists yhen, people were in trouble facing difficult situations. With the passge of time, society start funding and modern tecnology takes place . In present, most prominent invention of science involves discovery of transportation which have a spacious involvement in our daily life by supporting the mean of transportation . People have been facilitated by utilizing it and covering long distances in just few hours as compared to past.

On the other hand, science discovery can only be useful in that term when anyone can support that material and provide any feedback for further discoveries. Human is only individuals that can support any exmperiment so science goal should be to focus on people live. For instance, by providing health care medicines and equipments are consumed and varies considerably in daily life by utilizing and giving feddbacks to further accuracy however, it also enhanced human life style and envirnment .In present, doctors are aware of every disease meanwhile, every kind of medicine and cure is available for

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear in the opening: you entirely agree that science should improve people’s lives, and you give relevant examples involving transport and healthcare. These examples show an understanding of the topic, but the response only partly develops the argument. The transport paragraph explains convenience and faster travel, while the healthcare discussion begins to mention medicines, equipment and feedback but does not complete the point. The claim that science’s “only goal” is to facilitate society is also asserted rather than examined; consider acknowledging other aims, such as expanding knowledge, and explaining how they can ultimately benefit people. A more fully developed explanation of each example and a clear concluding statement would make the response more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an opening position and separate paragraphs about science’s benefits and human involvement in discoveries. Examples such as transportation and healthcare give the reader some direction. However, progression between ideas is not consistently clear: the second paragraph moves from machinery to historical difficulties and then transport, while the third shifts from feedback on experiments to medical treatment. Connect each paragraph’s points through a clear main idea and explain how each example supports it. Some linking expressions, including “On the other hand” and “however,” suggest contrast where the relationship is not clear. The final sentence is unfinished, so the discussion lacks a complete ending; add a conclusion that restates your position and summarises your reasons.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “transportation,” “experiments,” “medicines,” “equipment” and “discoveries,” and this gives the response a basic range for discussing science. However, word choice and collocation are often inaccurate or repetitive, sometimes making the intended meaning difficult to follow. For example, “science invention” and “facilitates the society” are not natural combinations, while “spacious involvement” does not clearly express the role of transport in daily life. There are also frequent spelling errors, such as “methadologies,” “tecnology” and “envirnment.” Build accuracy by learning common academic word partnerships and checking spelling, and choose precise terms rather than repeating broad words such as “people” and “science.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a sentence beginning “because” and a conditional idea about science being useful when people support it. However, complex structures are often faulty, and errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence boundaries frequently make the meaning difficult to follow. Examples include “is to improved,” “science goal should be,” and “people were in trouble facing difficult situations.” Several sentences also run together or contain incomplete clauses; the final sentence ends with “available for” and has no completion. Practise building complete sentences with one clear main clause, then add subordinate clauses carefully. Check subject–verb agreement and verb forms, and use full stops to separate ideas.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.