Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-25

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Many people living in the society believes that that the main aim of science should be improving the lives of the human beings. I completely, agree with the idea that science should focus on solving the real world problems and improving the health and environment.

Firstly, the main reason should be focus on the helping people health. In the past the people suffers from many dangerous diseases like plague, cholera and small pox these diseases cause loss of many lives and threat of spreading to many people. Thanks to scientific development like vaccines and modern medicines, these diseases are no longer exists. Consequently many scientist are working to cure the diseases like cancer and other dangerious diseases. However, if scienctist have not done the research we are unable to get life-saving medicines, and many people would still suffer from the disease.

Secondly, the science helps us in solving the real world problems. the play crucial role in solving the difficulties. Today the human beings are faciong the global warming like climatic change and pollution. Subsequently in order to solve these problem the scientist have developed clean sources like solar panels and wind turbine to clean the air and reduce the air pollution. Futhermore, agriculture scientist have introduce the such a techniques were crops will grow in less amount of water. Additioonally these will help the poorer countries,to survive in hunger conditions and farmers will able to produce more food. Since, these example helps us to understand that science is highly valuable which protect our planet and lives.

In conclusion, i strongly believe that science play a major role in protecting the enviroment and health of human beings by focusing on medical progress and environment solutions science can create a safer, healthier and better world for everyone.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: you completely agree that science should improve people’s lives, and the conclusion maintains this view. Both body paragraphs give relevant reasons, covering health through vaccines and medicines, and environmental and agricultural solutions such as renewable energy and crops that need less water. These examples support the central argument and address the task directly. To strengthen the response further, develop the examples with more precise explanation rather than relying on broad claims—for instance, explain how a particular scientific advance has improved health or reduced pollution. The point about helping poorer countries is relevant, but its connection to the agricultural example could be made more explicit. Overall, the argument is clear and supported, though some claims are generalised.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs organised around health and practical problems, and a conclusion that restates your position. Sequencing words such as “Firstly,” “Secondly,” “Furthermore,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the progression, and the main ideas are grouped appropriately. This provides a coherent foundation. However, some linking is mechanical, and a few connections are unclear: “Subsequently” does not naturally introduce the response to global warming, while “these example helps us to understand” refers back to several points without a precise link. The sentence beginning “the play crucial role” also lacks a clear subject, interrupting the flow. Use transitions that express the exact relationship between ideas and make references explicit to improve cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “vaccines,” “modern medicines,” “global warming,” “solar panels,” and “agriculture,” so the reader can understand the areas of science you discuss. There are also attempts at more specific expressions such as “life-saving medicines” and “clean sources.” However, the range and control are uneven: repeated use of “people,” “science,” and “problems” limits precision, and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, including “dangerious diseases,” “clean the air,” and “survive in hunger conditions.” Spelling errors such as “scienctist,” “Futhermore,” and “Additioonally” are noticeable. Build a more precise vocabulary for describing scientific effects, and check spelling and natural word combinations during revision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mixture of simple and complex sentences, including a conditional structure in “if scientists have not done the research, we are unable to get life-saving medicines” and a subordinate clause beginning “Since.” This shows an effort to vary sentence forms, and the overall meaning is usually recoverable. However, errors occur across sentence types and sometimes make the reader pause. Examples include subject–verb agreement in “Many people … believes” and “science play,” incorrect verb forms in “the people suffers” and “scientists have introduce,” and missing or misplaced articles in “the play crucial role.” Punctuation and sentence boundaries also need attention, particularly the lowercase “the” after a full stop and commas that separate clauses awkwardly. Practise accurate agreement, verb forms, and clause punctuation while retaining your attempts at complex sentences.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.