Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-26

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is widely argue that the primary objective of science should be to raise standard of living of individuals. I strongly agree with this notion to a great extend because of

One of the main reasons for my opinion is advanced health treatment. This is to say, scientists and researchers have innovated number of vaccines and antibiotics to pervent harmful diseases, which has increased the life expectency of people. Moreover, the deadly diseases can be diagnose early with the help of advanced medical equipments. As a result, people enjoy healthy life. For example, the disease like cancer was main cause of death in past because its treatment was not available, now science has found medical producer to treat this disease.

Another reason in its favor is society well-being. This is due to the fact that the advance technical gadgets have made every task convient and time effective for people, when they are preoccupied and have other commitments to finish. In other words, the innovations of washing machines, vaccum clearner and robots have made household chores less labouries. For example, in the past people spend long time to finish simple task, which technology complete in minutes. therefore, it has great importance in improving the life og people.

In conclusion, I agree to a considerable extend that the significant purpose of science is to enhance living condition of people because of the reasons outlined.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear: you strongly agree that science should improve people’s lives, and both body paragraphs give relevant reasons—medical advances and household technology. The examples of vaccines, cancer treatment, washing machines and robots help connect your argument to the topic. However, the ideas are only partly developed: the cancer example is asserted rather than explained, and the benefits of household devices could be linked more explicitly to people’s well-being. The introduction also ends unfinished (“because of”), which leaves the opening rationale incomplete. The response is 18 words below the required minimum, so it does not meet the task’s length requirement. Develop each example with a specific explanation and complete the introduction to address the task more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable overall structure: an introduction, two reason-based paragraphs and a conclusion. The paragraphs each focus on one main idea, and signposts such as “Moreover,” “As a result” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. However, some linking is mechanical, and the relationship between sentences is not always smooth. For instance, “This is to say” and “In other words” introduce explanations that largely repeat the preceding point, while the cancer example is joined to the previous sentence with a comma splice. The unfinished opening sentence also disrupts the progression from the position to the first reason. Use fewer formulaic transitions, make each sentence add a distinct step to the argument, and check punctuation between complete clauses.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “vaccines,” “antibiotics,” “life expectancy,” “medical equipment” and “household chores,” which allows you to discuss both health and technology. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “primary objective” and “considerable extent.” However, a limited range of expressions and several inaccurate word choices or forms reduce precision: “medical producer” does not convey the intended meaning, and “society well-being” and “time effective” are unnatural combinations. Spelling errors such as “pervent,” “vaccum” and “conveient” are noticeable. Build accuracy by learning common collocations and checking spelling and word forms; this will make your ideas clearer without requiring more complicated vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in “diseases, which has increased…” and a conditional-style time clause beginning “when they are preoccupied.” This gives the response some structural variety. However, errors occur in verb forms, articles, agreement and sentence boundaries. Examples include “It is widely argue” instead of a correctly formed passive, “diseases can be diagnose,” and “people spend long time,” where the verb form or article is missing. The opening sentence is incomplete, and the cancer example joins two independent clauses with only a comma. These errors sometimes make the reader pause, although the main meaning is generally recoverable. Practise accurate passive constructions and clause punctuation, then proofread each sentence for a complete subject and verb.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.