Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Innovation in science and technology improve people's lives in many ways, some might say that it's their main goal.

Many innovation helps in making human life better and easy too like mobile phones are prime example. I completely agree with this statement that science should improve's human life.

To begin with, technology over the years have evolved in many ways which benefits human. The research in medical sector and environment sector have made human life a lot easy like less pollution, sustainable development and reduction in carbon emmission. All of these research are made for betterment of humans. For example, the development of moblie phones has ease the life of people living abroad like faster communication with their loved ones. Because of that we even get easy access to information and it also helps so many students to clear their difficulties.

Nowadays, the technology has even help people to learn something online very easy and because of it people get hired for work. The research even helps in boosting the economy of the country. The innovation in science sometimes have drawbacks like if a research fail because of any reason the time and money also is of no use. However, their action initially was only to make people's life easy. Most of the research made by science has a good outcome eventually.

To conclude, the main goal of science should be to make human life better and I completely agree with this statement. Technology has regularly given us better outcomes which makes everyone life easier and with the advancement in science in future also we will make new resesrch to ease the human life.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction to the conclusion: you completely agree that science should improve human life. You support this with relevant examples, including medical and environmental research, mobile-phone communication, and online learning. These examples show a sound response to the question. However, some points are asserted rather than explained. For instance, “less pollution” and “sustainable development” are listed without showing how scientific research achieves them, and the point about failed research is not developed into a clear qualification of your argument. To strengthen the response, explain the impact of each example and connect it directly to why improving people’s lives should be science’s most important aim.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, supporting paragraphs, and a conclusion, and the ideas generally follow a sensible order. Linking phrases such as “To begin with,” “For example,” “However,” and “To conclude” help signal the stages of your argument. However, progression within the body paragraphs is sometimes loose: medical and environmental research, phones, education, employment, and the economy are introduced in quick succession without clear grouping or enough explanation. Some connections are also unclear, particularly the shift from failed research to the claim that most research eventually has a good outcome. Organise related examples together and use clearer references and transitions to show how each point supports your central position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant topic vocabulary, including “sustainable development,” “carbon emission,” “communication,” “research,” and “advancement in science.” This gives you enough range to discuss the topic, but several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, which limits precision. For example, “made human life a lot easy” and “has ease the life” do not express the intended meaning naturally; “research” and “life” are also repeated frequently. There are spelling errors such as “moblie,” “emmission,” and “resesrch.” Build a wider set of accurate phrases for describing benefits and outcomes, and check spelling carefully. More precise vocabulary would make your examples clearer and your argument more convincing.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a conditional idea about research failing and clauses introduced by “which” and “because.” The overall meaning is usually understandable, but some errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence boundaries reduce accuracy. Examples include “Innovation … improve,” “technology … have evolved,” and “the technology has even help”; these need consistent subject–verb agreement and verb forms. The opening also joins two independent clauses with only a comma, while “I completely agree …” contains an unnecessary apostrophe in “improve’s.” Practise checking each sentence for its subject and main verb, and use full stops or suitable conjunctions to separate complete ideas. This will help you retain variety while improving control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.