Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Many people belive that the main goalof science should be to make human lives better. i completely agree with the argued assertion, because scientific discoveries protect our health and make our lives work much easier.

First of all, the most important reason why science exists is to save human lives through medicine. Doctors and resin the rearchers use science to study diseases and find curse. Without science we would not have vaccines and cure to the health problems and any such disesase or medicines for any dangerous illnesses.

Secondly, science creathed new technologies that make our daily lives more comfortable and efficient. In the modern world, almost everything we use comes from scientific research. For instance, smartphone, computers and the internet allow us to talk to our families and do our work from anywhere. If science did not focus on making life easier , we would still live without electricity or basic machine.

In conclusion, I fully agree that improving human lives is the most essential purpose of science. by focusing on helpful technology, science directly solves real world problems and creates a better future for everyone.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

Your position is clear: you state that you “completely agree” and return to this view in the conclusion. Both reasons—medical science saving lives and technology making daily life easier—are relevant, with examples such as vaccines, smartphones and the internet. However, the response addresses the task only partially because these points are asserted rather than sufficiently explained or supported. For example, the medical paragraph repeats the idea of cures and medicines without showing how a particular scientific advance improves people’s lives. The technology paragraph also makes a broad claim about modern life but does not develop its consequences. The response is 63 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to develop examples and reasoning. Extend each main point with a specific example and explanation.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction presents your view, two body paragraphs give separate reasons, and a conclusion restates your position. The signposts “First of all,” “Secondly,” and “In conclusion” make the sequence easy to follow, and the examples are placed with the relevant points. This clear structure is a strength. To move beyond this level, make the links between claims and explanations more explicit and avoid relying mainly on formulaic transitions. For instance, after mentioning smartphones and the internet, explain how they improve communication or access to work. The medical paragraph would also benefit from a clearer progression from scientific research to a specific treatment and its effect. Check spacing and punctuation around transitions so the flow remains smooth.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate your main ideas, including “scientific discoveries,” “vaccines,” “diseases,” “technologies,” and “efficient.” The examples of smartphones, computers and the internet also make the discussion concrete. However, the range is limited and some word choices, spelling errors and collocations reduce precision. Examples include “goalof,” “belive,” “rearchers,” “find curse,” and “science creathed”; these can make parts of the medical argument difficult to understand. Phrases such as “make our lives work much easier” are also unnatural. Aim to check spelling carefully and learn common academic combinations, such as “conduct research,” “develop treatments,” and “improve quality of life.” More precise vocabulary would help you explain your ideas without repetition.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use mostly straightforward sentence patterns, with some attempts at more complex structures, such as “If science did not focus on making life easier, we would still live without electricity.” This conditional is relevant and shows an effort to vary sentence forms. However, the range remains limited, and errors in sentence construction, capitalisation, articles and punctuation occur throughout. For example, “i completely agree” needs a capital letter, while “smartphone, computers and the internet” needs a plural or an article before the first item. The sentence beginning “Without science” is difficult to follow because its ideas are joined unclearly. Practise building accurate sentences with one main claim and a supporting clause, and proofread for sentence boundaries, capital letters and commas.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.