Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-01

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The primary goal of science is to better people’s lives. I completly agree with the statement as science play a vital role in everyone life to make better by involving in works, improving technology also in medical sector.

Improvements in science made easy completion of works. Nowadays computers provide easy accesible to completion of work. Also, invention of machines make us to work effectively. For example, Work that done manually was changed after invention of machines. Moreover, many improvemnets are happened in medical sector. Developments of various drugs provide facilate to live for long days. In instance, For any kind of disease there is a treatment available now resulting the better life to lead.

Science also achived numerous improvements along production side. Earlier there are limited source to genetically evolved seeds as they can sustain anykind of climatic conditions. Development on seeds resulted in improvement of production and easy availability of food. On the other side, science is developing technologies in military sectors. Upgradation of vehicles and equipment will make soliders to compet in war fields. Improvemnts in life jackets results to limit the deaths in war.

At my point science is playing an important role to improve people's life by various methods such as development in medical sector and improvements in technology.

I conclude by, science play a vital role in everyone life to make better by involving in works, improving technology also in medical sector.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

Your position is clear from the opening: you completely agree that science should improve people’s lives. You give relevant examples from work, medicine, food production and military technology, so the response addresses the topic. However, the ideas are mostly asserted rather than explained. For instance, you mention machines and genetically improved seeds but do not show in detail how these changes improve people’s lives or discuss any limits to your position. The military example is also not clearly connected to the main claim. The conclusion repeats the introduction instead of drawing together your reasons. The response is 13 words below the required minimum, and this contributes to the limited development. Extend the key examples and explain their effects more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, two body paragraphs and a conclusion. The body paragraphs group examples by topic, and linking expressions such as “Moreover” and “On the other side” show an attempt to connect ideas. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the shift from food production to military technology is abrupt, and the relationship between military equipment and improving people’s lives needs to be made explicit. Some links are mechanical or inaccurate, including “On the other side,” while repeated references to science and improvement make the argument feel circular. The conclusion largely repeats the opening. Use clearer topic sentences, develop one main point at a time, and use referencing and transitions to show how each example supports your position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use topic-related vocabulary such as “medical sector,” “genetically evolved seeds,” “production” and “technology,” which helps communicate the general subject. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, sometimes making the meaning difficult to follow. For example, “easy accesible to completion of work” and “provide facilate to live for long days” do not express the intended benefits naturally. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “completly,” “improvemnets” and “achived.” Aim to use precise, familiar collocations rather than assembling phrases word by word; for example, explain that machines “make tasks more efficient” or that treatments “help people live longer.” Proofreading would also improve clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, including examples introduced with “For example” and “resulting…”. However, the range is limited, and errors occur frequently in basic sentence patterns as well as in more complex attempts. Examples include “science play” and “everyone life,” where agreement and possessive forms are incorrect, and “Work that done manually,” which is missing a verb. The opening sentence also has an unclear structure: “science play a vital role… to make better by involving in works.” These errors can make the reader work to understand your meaning. Practise accurate subject–verb agreement, articles and complete clauses, then build longer sentences using clear cause-and-effect structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.