Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is often argued that one of the important purposes of the scientific study and innovations should be to improve the lives of people. I completely agree with this opinion because it is one of the easiest and best ways to enhance an average person life.

With the advancement in scientifc study, it is very common to see the both positive and negative impact of scientific research. On one hand it is used to make atomic bomb whereas on the other hand it is utilised to manufacture flying cars, robots, AI machines etc. Furthermore, if we look at the history, we only remember those faces whose mind was used to make common lives easy such as Nichola Tesla, Marrie Curie. This is because solving a daily life problem makes a study very impactful.

In several countries, the governments are spending trillions of dollars on education, grants, scholarships so people can be benefited. It is the same as spending on infrastructure or transport. For example in China, majority of the labs are working to provide affordable solutions to the already existing expensive drugs and medicines. Similarly, new discoveries are on the way to build economically feasible lab diagnostic equipments.

In my opinion, it's never about what is the innovation or knowledge but it is majorly about how we use it. Apart from that, government bodies should develop strict legislation bodies which make sure that scientific data is not in unsafe hands. In order to make scientific discoveries more impactful, government should be more connected with the common person from time to time to understand their demands and needs.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the opening: you completely agree that science should improve people’s lives, and you return to the importance of public benefit in the conclusion. The examples of affordable medicines and diagnostic equipment are relevant and help explain how research can address everyday needs. You also recognise that science can have harmful applications, such as atomic weapons, which adds some balance. However, the discussion of Tesla and Curie is asserted rather than explained, and the contrast between weapons and “flying cars, robots, AI machines” does not show clearly how these innovations improve ordinary lives. To develop the response further, explain the benefits and limitations of your examples and connect each one explicitly to your central argument.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a coherent overall shape: it introduces a position, develops examples in separate paragraphs, and ends with recommendations about responsible use and public needs. Linking phrases such as “On one hand,” “Furthermore,” and “Similarly” help readers follow the discussion. The progression is not always fully smooth, however. The paragraph moving from historical scientists to the claim that solving daily problems makes research impactful would benefit from a clearer explanation, while the final paragraph introduces regulation and government consultation without showing how these points follow from the earlier examples. Some transitions feel formulaic. Use clearer topic sentences and make the relationship between each example and your argument explicit to create more continuous progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “scientific research,” “affordable solutions,” “lab diagnostic equipment,” and “scientific discoveries.” These choices make the subject clear, and terms such as “economically feasible” show an attempt to use more precise language. Some word choices and collocations are less natural, including “average person life,” “those faces whose mind was used,” and “strict legislation bodies.” There are also spelling errors in “scientifc,” “Nichola,” “Marrie,” and “equipments,” which reduce accuracy. Aim for natural academic collocations and check spelling and countability: for example, refer to “ordinary people’s lives,” “scientists whose work,” and “diagnostic equipment.” This would make your vocabulary more precise and fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including a conditional clause in “if we look at the history” and a purpose clause in “so people can be benefited.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, and the contrast structure beginning “On one hand” shows an attempt to vary sentence patterns. Some grammatical errors remain. In “one of the important purposes … should be,” the construction is awkward; “one of the most important purposes … is” would be clearer. “The both positive and negative impact” has an article and number problem, and “common lives easy” lacks a possessive form. The final sentence also shifts between singular “government” and plural “demands and needs” without a clear subject relationship. Review articles, possessives, agreement, and sentence phrasing while retaining your complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.