Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-03

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The science and technology help in every field of living. The most inportant aim of science to make better lifestyle of people. Science interfers in the our daily life and having target to innovate new technologies that improve our living style. In my point of view science has many advantages and disvantages that having effect on our lives.

In the myraid of reasons, science discovers new techniques on the daily basis that influence lives of people and people use these new method to make their lives easy. For example, the innovations in auto mobile industries the travalling for people become easy nowaday. On other hands, in the medical field science invents latest version of surgical techniques which help doctors to do surgucal procedure.However, the science modernises the living style of people by using new discoveries in the science and technology in present day.

Contrarily, these innovations also effects the daily life of the people and having some drwabacks that harmful for people lives. Like increase in vehicals on road rise the noise and smoke pollution that are harmful for people live.

In conclusion, today science has aim to make people lives to improve. If we should follow these new invents of science and adapt them then our live will be made pleasant. That why science helps us in every direction of our live .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You address the central topic and give a broadly supportive position, stating that science aims to improve people’s lives. The examples of easier travel and surgical techniques are relevant, and you also acknowledge pollution as a drawback. However, the response only partially develops the question of whether improving lives should be science’s most important aim: it does not explain how this aim compares with other possible priorities or develop a clear, sustained argument. The conclusion repeats the general view rather than resolving that issue. The response is also 26 words below the required minimum, which limits the space available to explain and support your ideas. Develop each example with a specific effect and make your degree of agreement explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph presenting benefits, a paragraph noting a drawback, and a conclusion. This gives the reader a basic route through your ideas. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear, and several linking expressions do not show the intended relationship. For example, “On other hands” introduces the medical example, while “However” then appears to continue the benefits rather than contrast them. “Contrarily” signals a contrast, but the drawback is only briefly stated. Some ideas are repeated, particularly the claim that science improves people’s lives. Use clearer topic sentences, connect each example directly to your argument, and reserve contrast markers for genuine contrasts.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-related vocabulary, including “innovations,” “surgical techniques,” and “pollution,” so the main subject is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several spelling errors or inaccurate word choices make the writing less clear, such as “inportant,” “interfers,” “disvantages,” and “drwabacks.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, including “make better lifestyle” and “latest version of surgical techniques.” Repetition of “science,” “people,” and “lives” further restricts the range. Build a bank of accurate collocations for discussing benefits and risks, and check spelling carefully. More precise vocabulary would help you explain the examples without relying on repeated general terms.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, and the reader can usually identify your main meaning. However, the range of structures is limited, and errors occur frequently, including in basic sentence patterns. Examples include “The most important aim of science to make,” which is missing a verb, and “science discovers … and people use these new method,” where the plural form does not agree. Articles and sentence construction are also problematic in “Science interfers in the our daily life.” Punctuation is inconsistent, as in “procedure.However,” and some sentences join ideas without clear grammatical control. Practise forming accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then add subordinate clauses and check articles, agreement, plurals, and punctuation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.