Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · Cambridge IELTS 18 · 2026-11-04

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

 

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The most necessary target of the science is now to make human's live easy and improved. I totally agree with this staement as science has improve many lives by making human life faster and a shown a significant growth in health sector.

Nowadays, science has been making human life faster and devloped. science has now played a major role in creating robots and making peoples life easier in various business. however, every vital role is now been played with science and technology which makes human workload less and making it convinient and faster. For instance, The work which was done by human and was getting completed in 2-3 hours is being done by science and it its getting done in just half hour which makes it often done perfect and with increased speed.

On the other side, science has made a major devlopment in health sector. it has been seen a major growth in health sector as technology has made it easier for doctor to analyize the problem and can cure the patient easily. furthermore , every disease can now be treated with it and with it surgeons can now treat everyone with robots which makes it efficient and better. For example, now doctors can treat the patient with the help of technology to analayze the situation and treat them to save many lives.

In conclusion, science has now improved human live easy and faster by making human work less hours saving more time, whereas health sector has also seen various devlopment in solving many lifes in health sector.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you totally agree that science should improve people’s lives. You address this through two relevant areas—making work faster and easier, and improving healthcare—and give examples such as robots completing tasks more quickly and technology helping doctors treat patients. These points respond to the question, but they are not developed equally or in much detail. The workplace example gives a time comparison, yet does not explain why this benefit makes improving lives science’s most important aim. The healthcare discussion makes broad claims, such as “every disease can now be treated,” without qualification or a specific illustration. To strengthen the response, explain the significance of each example and consider why this aim should take priority over other possible scientific goals.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs discuss work and healthcare, and a conclusion restates the position. The paragraphing helps readers follow the main topics, and transitions such as “For instance,” “On the other side,” and “In conclusion” signal stages in the argument. However, some linking is mechanical or does not express the relationship accurately: “On the other side” suggests a contrast, although healthcare is another supporting point. Ideas within paragraphs also repeat, particularly the claims that science makes work “faster” and “easier.” Some references, such as “with it” and “every vital role,” are unclear. Use more precise links and organise each paragraph around a claim followed by explanation and a focused example.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough topic-related vocabulary to communicate the main ideas, including “technology,” “health sector,” “surgeons,” and “workload.” However, the range is limited and several words or phrases are repeated, especially “human life,” “faster,” “easier,” and “health sector.” There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “staement,” “devloped,” “convinient,” and “analayze,” as well as inaccurate or unnatural collocations such as “human’s live easy” and “solving many lifes.” These choices sometimes make the meaning less clear. Build a more precise vocabulary for describing benefits and outcomes, and check spelling and word forms carefully. For example, use “improve quality of life” rather than “make human life easy,” and “medical advances” rather than repeatedly referring to growth in the health sector.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “as,” “which,” and “whereas.” This gives the response some structural variety, and the main argument is generally understandable. However, errors in sentence construction, verb forms, agreement, articles, and punctuation remain noticeable. For example, “science has improve many lives” has an incorrect verb form, while “science has now played a major role … however, every vital role is now been played” contains faulty tense and clause construction. In “technology has made it easier for doctor to analyize the problem and can cure the patient,” the subject of “can cure” is unclear. Practise accurate subject–verb patterns and sentence boundaries, and proofread for capitalisation after full stops. Clearer, shorter sentences would help you control the more complex structures you attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.