Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.5 · Cambridge IELTS 17 · 2026-11-09
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.5)
There has been various debates over the years concerning problems associated with the environment. A group of individuals believe that the main challenge is the decline of some species of flora and fauna while others maintain their opinion that there are more important environmental problems. In my opinion, I believe that there are far reaching factors that affects the environment in addition to loss of plants and animals.
Our sorrounding heavily depends on plants and animals for sustainability and reduction hence extinction of some species may cause damage to it. For instance, plants help in the regulation of oxygen and carbondioxide in the atmosphere and when they are nolonger available, servere imbalance may be experienced. Furthermore, some animals that are important in the balance of food chain when they are lost may lead to imbalance of the eco-system.
Some people believe that there are much more important environmental problems that should be addressed. The emmission of gas into the atmosphere from industries and cars has hugely affected the ozone layer leading to global warming. For example, thousands and thousands of vehicles used by people on a daily basis produce alot of carbondioxide that affect climate negatively. In addition, this can lead to the melting of ice in the polar regions hence increasing the ocurrences of natural calamities such as floods, droughts, hurricanes and, servere winters among others.
In my opinion, i believe that issues affecting the environment are numerous. Countries should device ways of identifying and curbing these problems to ensure sustainability of resources. Athough individuals should be encouraged to plant more trees and take care of endangered species, other aspects like control of carbon emmission should also be emphasised.
In conclusion, environmental problems spans various elements of our existance and should not be pegged on a singular factor. This will enable us have knowledge on how to better take care of it.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 6.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 6.0 |
| Overall | 6.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
The response addresses both views and gives a position: it explains why species loss matters, then discusses emissions and climate-related effects, before recommending action on both fronts. The examples about plants regulating atmospheric gases and vehicles producing carbon dioxide are relevant. Your view is present, but it is somewhat broad: the claim that environmental problems are “numerous” does not clearly establish which concern you consider most important or how the problems compare. Some points also need fuller explanation—for example, the link between species loss and food-chain imbalance is asserted rather than illustrated. To strengthen the response, make your comparative judgement more explicit and develop each main reason with a clearer explanation or specific example.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0
The essay has a clear overall progression: introduction, a paragraph for each view, your opinion, and a conclusion. Paragraphing helps the reader follow the discussion, and signposts such as “For instance,” “Furthermore,” and “In addition” make relationships between examples clear. The progression is generally logical, although the opinion paragraph partly repeats the introduction and the conclusion restates the broad idea without adding a decisive synthesis. Some links within sentences are awkward, particularly the sentence beginning “Furthermore, some animals…”; its structure makes the relationship between species loss and food-chain imbalance harder to follow. Aim for more precise referencing and use the final paragraph to bring the two views together rather than repeat general claims.
Lexical Resource: Band 6.0
You use an adequate range for the topic, including terms such as “flora and fauna,” “extinction,” “food chain,” “global warming,” and “natural calamities.” These choices help communicate the environmental discussion, and some less common vocabulary is attempted. However, several spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, including “sorrounding,” “carbondioxide,” “emmission,” and “ocurrences.” Some collocations are also unnatural, such as “decline of some species” in this context and “far reaching factors that affects the environment.” Prefer accurate, natural combinations and check spelling carefully. More precise terms for the scale and causes of environmental damage would help you express comparisons and consequences with greater flexibility.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0
The response includes both simple statements and attempts at complex sentences, for example, the conditional structure “when they are no longer available…” and the clause beginning “Although individuals should be encouraged…”. Meaning is generally clear, but some grammatical errors remain. In the opening, “There has been various debates” has a subject–verb agreement error; “factors that affects” also needs agreement. The sentence about animals and the food chain is structurally unclear, and “environmental problems spans” has a plural subject with a singular verb. Capitalisation is inconsistent in “i believe,” and some long sentences would benefit from clearer punctuation. Review agreement and sentence construction, while retaining your attempts to use subordinate clauses.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.