Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on television is harmless entertainment. Others disagree and think that it encourages violent behaviour.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Some individuals imagine that the fictional violence showed on cinema or other entertainment source is harmless, while other people do not agree and think it escalates violent behaviour. This essay will explain both point of views and finally I give my own opinion.

Initially, in that modern era, everyone have a source of entertainment like television, cinema, theatres, and smartphones. Everyone enjoy the entertainment at their own choice due to development of modern technology VFS are gradually improved and directors of movies or dramas show more and more imaginary violence. Most people think that fictional violence is harmless entertainment because everone know that it is scripted story and timeline having that intense type of violence in all movies. At the beginning of movie, the movies required a certificate from official violence handling board and these hired government officers see and delete the sharp fight that may against the rules. This board have huge duty to do their work according to modern generation mentality effect to see that violent scenes. That's why most mankind agree that these are harmless entertainment.

On the other hand, other humankind disagree this view and think that it encourages the violent behaviour. This is true some people have different phsychology and thinking idea so these violent scenes effect in their daily lifestyle. For instance in India and Pakistan, there are lot of news and incidents occur that young academics have commit a crime according to that type of movie. Furthermore, some individuals hide their crime to see the crime movies and also ask for technology like AI how to perform some specific crime without leave any evidence. These news also provided people a idea for crime and criminal minds do.

To sum up, these fictional entertainment may be effect the society and in my personal opinion, i totally agree to that statement that television entertainment is harmless due to the help of governments and movies handler board.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You address both views: the first body paragraph explains why scripted scenes and film classification may make fictional violence seem harmless, while the second argues that some viewers may imitate what they see. Your own position is also stated, but it is not fully clear: the conclusion says you agree that television entertainment is harmless, despite the preceding claim that it may affect society. The supporting ideas are relevant but under-developed. For example, the reference to young people committing crimes after watching films needs a specific, explained example, and the role of the classification board is asserted rather than shown to establish that violence is harmless. Make your position consistent and develop each main reason with clearer explanation or evidence.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the other hand” and “To sum up” helps readers follow the broad direction of the argument. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes difficult to track because several claims are joined without clear explanation. In the first body paragraph, the discussion moves from modern technology to scripted stories and then to the film board without showing how each point supports the harmless-entertainment view. References such as “these news” and “that type of movie” are also not always precise. Organise each paragraph around one clear reason, then explain and illustrate it; use linking phrases selectively rather than relying mainly on formulaic transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-related vocabulary, including “fictional violence,” “violent behaviour,” “scripted story,” and “crime,” so the subject is generally understandable. However, the range is limited by repeated general terms such as “people,” “entertainment,” and “violence,” and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or unclear. For example, “other entertainment source,” “violent scenes effect in their daily lifestyle,” and “criminal minds do” do not express the intended meanings naturally. There are also spelling errors, including “everone” and “phsychology.” Build a more precise set of expressions for discussing media influence and imitation, and check spelling and collocations. This would make your ideas easier to understand and give your vocabulary greater flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentence forms, including a conditional-style explanation and sentences beginning “because” and “while.” However, complex sentences are often not controlled successfully, and errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction recur. Examples include “everyone have,” “Everyone enjoy,” “these violent scenes effect,” and “young academics have commit a crime.” The final sentence also combines ideas in a way that makes the relationship between your opinion and the government board unclear. These errors sometimes make the reader work to understand your meaning. Practise building accurate subject–verb patterns and checking verb forms, then use shorter, complete sentences when a longer structure becomes difficult to control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.