Band 7.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 7.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-07-27
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on television is harmless entertainment. Others disagree and think that it encourages violent behaviour.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 7.5)
Some believe that the fictional violence people watch on television is harmless, whereas others think that it may encourage violent behaviour. I would argue that we need some restrictions on the content of movies but it does not indicate that the censorship office needs to eliminate all violent scenes.
Firstly, it is true that the fictional violence can barely bring a negative impact on adults as they have already been through many difficulties and formed their own values. On a contrary, watching some exciting scenes can entertain them in a better way because people always need to find an outlet to release pent-up energies. For instance, after working for long hours, employees can relax themselves by watching action movies, enabling them to have better energy for other tasks.
On the other hand, when it comes to children, who are not able to differentiate between positive and negative behaviours, they can be heavily influenced by videos that are rich in violent scenes. For example, if students were allowed to access every website online without restrictions, they would learn what they have just watched and apply them with classmates in schools, affecting the educational environment.
For these reasons, it must be admitted that the fictional violence has its advantages and disadvantages. In order to establish a better environment for younger generations, governments ought to censor sensitive information from movies and put a warning on their covers, which enables parents to decide whether or not their children can watch this movie. Meanwhile, it is of importance that adults can still access all the movies online as their mental health can affect the atmosphere within families.
In conclusion, while some believe that fictional violence is harmless because they focus on the benefit for adults, others think that it is harmful because their focus is on children. Thus, governments need to strike a balanced approach, allowing adults to access all the movies and restricting access for children.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 7.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 7.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 7.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 7.0 |
| Overall | 7.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 7.5
The response addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion. The ideas are relevant and generally well-developed. For instance, the distinction between the impact on adults and children is a logical way to approach the topic. The position is consistent throughout the essay, and the conclusion effectively synthesizes the arguments presented. To reach a higher band, the student could provide more specific examples or deeper analysis regarding the 'harmful' aspect of violence, as the current explanation of children imitating behavior is somewhat brief. Overall, the task is fulfilled competently.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 7.5
The essay is logically organized with a clear progression of ideas. Each paragraph has a central focus, and the transition between the two viewpoints is smooth, using appropriate linking phrases such as 'Firstly', 'On the other hand', and 'In conclusion'. Cohesive devices are used effectively, though there is occasional repetition of phrasing (e.g., 'fictional violence'). The paragraphing is appropriate, and the logical flow from the introduction to the conclusion is clear. The essay reads well and is easy to follow, meeting the requirements for a Band 7.
Lexical Resource — Band 7.0
The vocabulary is sufficient for the task and allows for some flexibility. The student uses topic-specific terms like 'censorship', 'pent-up energies', and 'sensitive information' appropriately. There are some minor inaccuracies in collocation, such as 'bring a negative impact' (usually 'have a negative impact') and 'on a contrary' (should be 'on the contrary'). However, these errors do not impede communication. The range of vocabulary is adequate to convey the intended meaning clearly, and the student demonstrates an attempt to use more sophisticated language, which is characteristic of the Band 6.5-7.0 range.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.0
The student uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. There is good control over sentence construction, and the meaning is always clear. While there are some minor grammatical slips, such as 'it does not indicate that the censorship office needs to eliminate' (a bit wordy) and 'it is of importance that adults can still access', the errors are not frequent enough to cause difficulty for the reader. The punctuation is generally accurate, and the sentence variety is sufficient to support the arguments effectively. The control of grammar is consistent, warranting a solid score.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.