Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-26
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on television is harmless entertainment. Others disagree and think that it encourages violent behaviour.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
Whether fictional violence portrayed on television is harmless entertainment or it encourages violent behaviour is a subject of considerable debate. While some say it is harmless entertainment, others argue that it encourages voilent behaviour. This essay will examine both the perspectives before explaning why i believe it encourages audience to behave violently.
On the one hand, people these days say that the voilence which is being shown in the fiction does not encourage it and it is purely for the entertainment purpose. For example, few movies consist acts of violence like fights, just to provide a satisfactory ending for the audience. As a result, some people like action movies more than the ones which does not contain any action. Therefore, it is understandable that why some people tend to believe showing violence on screen is harmless entertainment.
On the other hand, other people disagree with this view and argue that violence illustrated on television encourages voilent behaviour. The main reason is children get inspired easily. For example, if children watch something consisting lot of violence they even try to imitate the actions. Consequently, they might even end up in some sort of trouble. Furthermore, having acts of violence in movies can lead to violent behaviour. Although, giving satisfactory result to the audience is important, i believe movies and webseries should stop including acts like violence, or they must implement age restriction on those movies which contains brutality.
In Conclusion, both the approaches have their own merits. I believe that violence on screen prompt audience to act violently. Ultimately, restricting movies for a certain range of audience can be a better solutuion
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0
You address both views and state your own position clearly: the introduction says you believe screen violence encourages violent behaviour, and the conclusion repeats this view while proposing age restrictions. The examples about action films providing entertainment and children imitating what they watch are relevant. However, the two sides are not developed equally: the harmless-entertainment argument is mainly supported by audience preference and a “satisfactory ending,” while the risks to children receive more explanation. The claim that films “should stop including acts like violence” also sits uneasily beside your more moderate proposal of age restrictions. To strengthen the response, explain the reasoning behind each view more fully and make your final recommendation consistent with your position. The length requirement is met; eight words copied from the prompt were excluded from the count.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. Signposting such as “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In Conclusion” makes the progression easy to follow. Within paragraphs, however, links can feel mechanical, with repeated “For example,” “As a result,” and “Therefore.” Some connections are also unclear: “Although, giving satisfactory result to the audience is important” does not clearly show how this concession relates to the recommendation that follows. The conclusion repeats the position but adds little synthesis. For stronger cohesion, vary linking methods and make the relationship between each reason, example, and conclusion explicit; also use punctuation carefully around introductory linking phrases.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
You use a relevant range of topic vocabulary, including “fictional violence,” “imitate,” “violent behaviour,” and “age restriction,” so the main ideas are generally clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “subject of considerable debate.” However, several spelling errors—“voilent,” “voilence,” “explaning,” and “solutuion”—and awkward or imprecise combinations reduce accuracy. Phrases such as “the fiction,” “for the entertainment purpose,” and “satisfactory result” are not natural in this context, while “movies and webseries” is informal and imprecise. Build accuracy by checking spelling and learning common collocations for discussing media effects, audiences, and restrictions. More precise vocabulary would also help distinguish fictional portrayals from real-world behaviour.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including a contrast clause beginning “While some say…” and a conditional example beginning “if children watch…”. Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “some people tend to believe showing violence” needs a clearer construction, such as “believe that showing violence…,” and “children get inspired easily” would be more complete as “children can be easily influenced.” There are agreement and article problems in “the ones which does not contain” and “something consisting lot of violence.” Capitalisation is also inconsistent: “i” should be “I,” and “In Conclusion” should not capitalise both words. Review subject–verb agreement, articles, and sentence punctuation to improve control while retaining your range of structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.