Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on television is harmless entertainment. Others disagree and think that it encourages violent behaviour.

Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Many people argue that the telecast of fictional violance is safe entertainment while others oppose this view. This essay will contend both views and provide a personal opinion.

On the one hand, Television braodcast is becoming more popular day by day because of various types shows like action movies, series, darama, sports. It is one of the great source of entertainmen specially for youngers. The mainly love to watch animation where violence is included. But as the characters are fictional, they can easily understand that this type of activities are not possible in the real world. That's why many individuals think that this type of production does not promote violence.

On the other hand, youngsters are extremly tend to mimic others. So when they say some characters are fighting with each other, there is a huge possiblity that it will encourgage them to do this type of unwanted work. In many research, Scientist discover that childrens are subtly influence by their surroundings. Therefore, there is a high chance to foster violence inside the youngers. For example, when two brothers watch wrestling violence scence, they become excited to do this type of things in their home .As a result, sometimes adolescent gang are made from this mind set. Moreover, they try to demonstrate their power and sometimes fight against others groups causing injuries.

In conclusion, it is logical to think that a virtual character can not able to provoke childrens towards violence. However, it is true that youngsters are extremly vulnerable to television programs and shows characters behaviour which ultimetly lead them to violence.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You discuss both positions: the first body paragraph explains why fictional characters may be seen as harmless, while the second argues that young viewers may imitate violence. Your conclusion also gives a qualified view, acknowledging both sides. However, the position is not fully clear in the introduction, where “contend both views” does not state what you believe, and the conclusion’s opening claim that fictional characters cannot provoke children sits uneasily beside your final agreement that television can lead to violence. Support is relevant but general; the wrestling example helps, yet the claims about research and adolescent gangs need clearer explanation or a more specific example. State your opinion directly and develop each main reason more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two views, and a conclusion. “On the one hand,” “On the other hand,” and “In conclusion” help signal the essay’s stages. However, progression within paragraphs is sometimes unclear: the first paragraph moves from television’s popularity to animation and then to viewers’ understanding without explaining the links. In the second, the sequence from imitation to research, brothers wrestling, and adolescent gangs feels abrupt. Some references are also unclear, such as “they” in “they can easily understand” and “this type of things.” Build each paragraph around one main claim, then explain and illustrate it in a more connected sequence; make pronoun references explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant topic vocabulary, including “fictional,” “mimic,” “subtly influence,” “vulnerable,” and “demonstrate their power.” These choices show an attempt to discuss the issue beyond very basic terms. However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors make the writing less fluent, for example “violance,” “braodcast,” “darama,” “youngers,” and “mind set.” Some phrases are also unnatural or imprecise, such as “great source of entertainment” (missing an article in context) and “unwanted work” for violent actions. Aim for accurate collocations and more precise terms, such as “violent content,” “young viewers,” and “imitate aggressive behaviour,” and proofread spelling carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex forms, including a reason clause (“because of various types shows”) and a conditional-style explanation (“when they say some characters are fighting…”). Meaning is generally recoverable, but grammatical errors are frequent and sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. Examples include “It is one of the great source,” “The mainly love,” “youngsters are extremly tend,” and “a virtual character can not able to provoke,” which show problems with articles, agreement, verb forms, and sentence construction. There are also errors in plural and clause patterns, as in “two brothers watch wrestling violence scence.” Practise building accurate subject–verb–object sentences first, then add subordinate clauses, and check each sentence for a complete verb and correct agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.