Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table illustrates the total count of different types of crimes (fatal, seriuous, slight and total) over the time frame 1998 to 2007 in Great Britain, where percentage increase are shown for intital and final data.

Overall, all types of crime increase over the given time period, where slight crimes showed the most significant jump in number of crimes in contrast to fatal crime with a slight increased. Total crimes count went up gradually over the given time frame except at last.

It can be clearly seen from the table that, fatal crimes count fllactuated and went to peak at 2001/02 with the number 95, whereas lowest peak can be observed at 1998/99 with 49. That is why percentage increased is the lowest which is 18. Serious crimes increased and peak at 2005/06 with 476, while the number was lowes at initial years with 162.

However, there was a huge jump than others in slight crimes with a percentage of 405, where largest peak was in the 2005/06 with 3296 which carry biggest portion in total number of crimes.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify several relevant features, including the peak in fatal injuries in 2001–02, the highest serious-injury figure in 2005–06, and the large rise in slight injuries. However, the overview is not fully accurate: fatal injuries did not increase overall by only a slight amount in a steady pattern, and the total rose sharply from 2,367 to 3,912 in 2004–05 before falling to 3,821, rather than increasing gradually. The table also gives no total or serious/slight figures for 2006–07, so the opening claim that all categories increased across the whole period needs qualification. To develop the response, report the overall rise in total injuries and compare the scale of the percentage increases more precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction and overview are followed by details on fatal and serious injuries, then slight injuries. This gives the reader a basic route through the information. However, progression is weakened because the overview makes broad claims that the later details do not fully support, and the total figures are mentioned without being explained. Linking phrases such as “Overall,” “It can be clearly seen,” and “However” are used, but some feel formulaic or do not express a clear contrast. The final paragraph also ends abruptly without a concluding comparison. Grouping the overview around the overall total and the contrasting injury categories, then supporting each point with selected figures, would make the organisation clearer.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant vocabulary for describing data, including “percentage increase,” “peak,” “fluctuated,” and “largest,” so the main subject is generally understandable. However, several spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision: “seriuous,” “intital,” “fllactuated,” and “lowes” are noticeable, while “fatal crimes” and “slight crimes” are less accurate than terms describing injuries. Phrases such as “lowest peak” and “huge jump than others” are also awkward or unclear. Aim for consistent, precise language such as “fatal injuries,” “reached a high of,” and “rose by a larger percentage.” Proofreading spelling and choosing natural collocations will help your comparisons sound more controlled and academic.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mixture of simple and more complex sentences, including a relative clause in “where slight crimes showed…” and a contrast introduced by “whereas.” However, errors occur in sentence construction and agreement, for example “percentage increase are shown” and “fatal crimes count fllactuated and went to peak.” The phrase “the number was lowes at initial years” also has problems with article use and sentence structure. Some sentences are long and joined in ways that make the relationships between ideas unclear. Practise forming accurate comparisons with a clear subject and verb, such as “Fatal injuries fluctuated and peaked at 95 in 2001–02.” More reliable control of verb forms, agreement, and sentence boundaries would make the data easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.