Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The table provide data on the number of fatal , serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain between 1998 and 2007 , the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Overall,from 2004 to 2005 till, the figure recorded the highest percentage whereas, 1988 to 1999 year had the lowest figure.

Regrading of years, The period from 1998 to 1999 till increased sharply 49 number fatal ,162 number serious and 653 number slight over th period. From 1999 to 2000 year showed rose at 62 number ,200 number and 933 number respectively. Furthermore, between 2000 and 2001 uitl, this figure stood at 72number ,244 number and 1066 number whereas, one years before repidly went up at 95 number , 392 number and 1390 number throughout the period.

In contrast, from 2004 toi 2005 till , the table saw arrived at 77 number of fatal . 411 number serious and 3424 number slight .

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response3.5
Coherence and Cohesion4.5
Lexical Resource5.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall4.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.5

You identify the subject and include several figures, such as 49 fatal, 162 serious and 653 slight injuries in 1998–99. However, the response does not provide a reliable overview of the main trends: the claim that 1998–99 had the lowest figure is broadly supported, but the statement about the “highest percentage” in 2004–05 confuses annual totals with the percentage-increase row. Several figures are also misreported; for example, 2004–05 had 77 fatal, 411 serious and 3,424 slight injuries, not 3424 as a total or a clear comparison. The response omits the overall rise in total injuries and the percentage increases, and it is 18 words below the 150-word minimum. Develop a clear overview and select accurate comparisons.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is a basic attempt to organise the response, with an opening sentence, an overview, and a paragraph describing figures. Time markers such as “Furthermore” and “In contrast” also show an effort to connect information. However, progression is difficult to follow because the years are not consistently presented in sequence, and the final comparison jumps to 2004–05 without explaining how it relates to the earlier data. Phrases such as “from 1998 to 1999 till increased sharply” make the relationship between the period and the figures unclear. Use separate paragraphs for the overview and key comparisons, and group the data into clear stages. Choose linking expressions that accurately signal the relationship between points.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for describing data, including “percentage increase,” “figure,” “respectively,” and “rose.” This shows a basic range suited to the task. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or repetitive, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to interpret. For example, “the figure recorded the highest percentage” does not clearly distinguish a percentage increase from an annual number, while “the table saw arrived at” is not a natural way to describe a value. There are also spelling errors such as “Regrading,” “uitl,” and “repidly.” Aim for precise reporting verbs and standard data language, such as “the number rose to” or “accounted for,” and check spelling before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts both simple and more extended sentence forms, including a sentence beginning “Furthermore, between 2000 and 2001…” and a contrast introduced by “In contrast.” However, grammatical control is inconsistent, and errors often obscure the intended relationships. The opening has subject–verb disagreement (“The table provide”), while “the period … till increased sharply” lacks a clear grammatical subject and verb pattern. Articles, punctuation and spacing are also unreliable, as in “one years before repidly went up” and the many spaces before commas. Build accurate simple sentences first—for example, “In 1998–99, there were 49 fatal injuries”—then combine them with controlled clauses. Check agreement, tense, articles and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.