Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-11-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.5)

There is a table showing the total number ofinjuries caused by gun and knife, categoried into three categories of fatal, serious and slight between the years 1998 and 2007. It also shows the percentage increase in each of the ctegories over the years.

From the year 1998 to 2006, we can see a steady increase in the number of injuries over the years., except [redacted phone], ehich hd a slightly lesser number of injuries compared to the year after. The most injuries occured in the year [redacted phone], with 3912 total injuries, and the second highest in for the eat [redacted phone].

The number of Slight and fatal injuries can also be seen to have been incresing continuously over the years. The only exception is year [redacted phone], which hs seen a slight deep in the numbers.

The number of fatal injuries increased from th year 1998 till the year 2001 nd mid 2002. Contrdictly to the other 2 divisions of injuries, the number is seeen to fluctuate in the years after.

There was only 18 percent incerease for fatal injuries over the year, where the other type of injuries had increased much more, for serious 194 adn slight 405 percent.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the table’s subject and report several relevant features, including the overall rise in total injuries to a peak of 3,912 in 2004–05 and the much larger percentage increases for slight and serious injuries than for fatal injuries. However, the overview is incomplete and some trends are inaccurate: slight injuries did not rise continuously, since they fell from 3,424 to 3,296 in 2005–06, and fatal injuries fluctuated rather than increasing continuously to 2001–02. You also omit the serious-injury trend, which rose overall to 476, and do not explain that the final year has no figures for these categories. Select the main patterns more accurately and compare them clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable paragraph structure: an introduction, comments on totals, and discussion of injury categories and percentage changes. This gives the reader some organisation, and phrases such as “The only exception” help signal contrast. However, the progression is not consistently clear. The discussion moves from total injuries to slight and fatal injuries, then back to fatal injuries, while serious injuries receive only a percentage figure. Some links are also awkward or unclear, such as “Contrdictly to the other 2 divisions,” and the repeated use of “The number of…” makes the account feel list-like. Group the overview first, then compare the three injury categories in a more deliberate order.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use relevant task vocabulary, including “total injuries,” “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “fluctuate” and “percentage increase,” so the topic is generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several word-choice or spelling errors are noticeable, including “categoried,” “incresing,” “deep” for a decline, and “Contrdictly.” Some phrasing is also imprecise: “the year after” does not clearly identify which year, and “increased continuously” is not suitable for a fluctuating series. Aim for accurate trend language such as “rose overall,” “fell slightly,” and “varied,” and proofread spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, for example, “The only exception is year 2005-2006, which…” and “There was only 18 percent increase…”. The main meaning is usually recoverable, but errors in sentence construction and grammatical forms recur. Examples include the missing article in “is year 2005-2006,” the awkward clause “which hs seen,” and the incomplete comparison in “where the other type of injuries had increased much more.” The opening sentence also has a faulty construction around “caused by gun and knife, categoried into…”. Use complete, controlled clauses, check articles and verb forms, and make comparisons grammatically parallel. More accurate sentence patterns would make the data easier to follow.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.