Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-01

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The given table depicts the data on categories of injuries from gun and knife crime in Great Britain between 1998 to 2007 and it increases over the period of time.

Overall, it can be clearly seen that thousands of crimes were noticed in slight injury. While, the hundreds of crimes were notified in serious type of injury. Lastly, few crimes were reported under hundreds of fatal injury.

To begin with, according to the table the minimum criminal cases were observed in initial year in all types of injuries, which was 49 in fatal injury, 162 in serious injury and 653 slight injuries. In addition to, the number of crimes had been increased after 1999. However, in [redacted phone], the fatal injury cross 90, serious notified 392 and slight injury observed 1390. Lastly, in 2002, more than 2000 total cases were identified.

Furthermore, as per the table the fatal injury decreased after 2002. Meanwhile, the serious and slight injury was increased over the period of time. Moreover, in the last year fatal injury was noticed only 58 crime cases. In contrast, other types of injuries observed 0 cases. In the end, the total amount of increases was noticed in slight injury which was 405 and minimum cases was noticed in fatal injury.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response attempts to summarize the data, but it fails to accurately report the key features. The description of the trends is often confusing or factually inconsistent with the provided data (e.g., claiming 'other types of injuries observed 0 cases' in the final year, which is not supported by the table). While you identified the categories, the analysis lacks precision in comparing the figures over the decade. To improve, focus on selecting the most significant data points—such as the peak years or the overall percentage changes—rather than listing individual years in a way that obscures the main trends. Ensure your summary accurately reflects the data presented in the visual aid.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The essay is organized into paragraphs, which helps the reader follow the structure. However, the use of cohesive devices is often mechanical or misused. For example, 'In addition to' is used incorrectly as a sentence starter, and 'In the end' is not an appropriate way to introduce a concluding summary in an academic report. The progression of ideas is sometimes disjointed, particularly when moving between the years and the categories of injury. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of linking words more naturally and ensure that each paragraph has a clear, logical focus that contributes to the overall summary.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is somewhat limited and repetitive. You frequently use basic phrases like 'the number of crimes' and 'observed'. There are also issues with word choice and collocation, such as 'notified in serious type of injury' and 'fatal injury cross 90'. These errors occasionally make the meaning slightly unclear. To improve, try to incorporate more precise academic vocabulary related to data description, such as 'fluctuated', 'peaked', 'remained stable', or 'a significant rise'. Expanding your range of synonyms for 'increase' and 'decrease' will also help demonstrate a more flexible command of the language.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains a mix of simple and some complex sentence structures, but there are frequent grammatical errors that affect the flow. Issues include incorrect verb tenses (e.g., 'the fatal injury cross 90'), missing articles, and awkward phrasing (e.g., 'the total amount of increases was noticed'). Punctuation is generally functional, but the sentence construction often feels unnatural. To improve, focus on subject-verb agreement and the correct use of passive voice, which is essential for describing data. Reviewing basic sentence patterns will help you reduce the frequency of errors and improve the overall clarity of your writing.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.