Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The data in tabulated form of death, effectivr and modrate injuries because of pistol and sharp knife against the law in specifically Great britain betweein 1998 to 2007 in addition ratio increase for individual amount of inury throughout the duration.

Overall, it is clearly observed that, medium injured Britishers numbers are more than others. Over the span particular that ratio surged in dobble which is 405.

Firstly, the fatal residents' numbers incresed steadilyin begining years till 2002. Afterthat their ratio was proportionally fall and cummulative their 18% death increased. Meanwhile, the topic about serious patients has three times greater then fatal people. these specifically exageurate over the period mostly and their counts was 194% climbed. While between [redacted phone] there has no-one who had serious injury in crime.

Furthermore, medium injured patients counts reatively highest among tree category about six time efficient from serious patients's numbers. it started with 653 patients and at the end of 2006 it became 3296 although in 2006,7 there also has not anyone as a victim patient. Whereas in gun, knife crime containe cummulative 405% of slight inured. and total over the 9 years 342% crime increased .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0

The response attempts to summarize the data, but it fails to clearly identify and report the main features. The description of the trends is often confusing, particularly the interpretation of the percentage increases. For instance, the statement that 'medium injured Britishers numbers are more than others' is vague, and the claim that there were no serious injuries in 2006-2007 is a misinterpretation of the data provided. The overview is weak and lacks a clear, accurate summary of the overall trends. While the response covers the categories, the lack of precision in reporting the figures and the misreading of the table significantly hinder the task achievement.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.0

The response is organized into paragraphs, but the logical flow is frequently interrupted by unclear phrasing and grammatical errors. While some cohesive devices are used (e.g., 'Firstly', 'Furthermore', 'Meanwhile'), they are often applied incorrectly or in a way that makes the sentences difficult to follow. The referencing is sometimes confusing, such as the transition between the discussion of fatal and serious injuries. The overall progression of ideas is disjointed, making it challenging for the reader to track the comparison of the different crime statistics over the specified period.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.0

The vocabulary is limited and often inaccurate. There are numerous spelling errors (e.g., 'tabulated', 'effectivr', 'modrate', 'dobble', 'exageurate', 'tree') and incorrect word choices (e.g., 'Britishers', 'proportionally fall', 'efficient' used instead of 'times'). The student struggles to use precise terminology to describe statistical trends, relying on repetitive and sometimes nonsensical phrasing. The range of vocabulary is insufficient to convey the information clearly, and the errors occasionally impede the reader's understanding of the data being presented.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.0

The response contains frequent grammatical errors that affect readability. There are issues with subject-verb agreement, incorrect tense usage, and awkward sentence structures (e.g., 'there has no-one who had serious injury', 'crime containe cummulative 405%'). Punctuation is also inconsistent, particularly with the use of commas and periods. While there is an attempt to use complex sentences, they are often poorly constructed and contain errors that cause confusion. The control of grammar is weak, and the high frequency of errors is a significant issue throughout the text.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.