Band 8.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 8.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 8.0)

The table illustrates the number of casualties resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain between 1998 and 2007, categorised by severity (fatal, serious, and slight), alongside the overall percentage growth for each group.

Overall, all three categories of injury saw an upward trend across the period, with slight injuries experiencing by far the steepest growth. Furthermore, slight injuries consistently accounted for the vast majority of total casualties, whereas fatal injuries remained the least common throughout.

Regarding minor incidents, slight injuries stood at 653 cases in 1998–1999 and increased continuously each year, reaching a peak of 3,424 in 2004–2005 before dipping slightly to 3,296 by 2005–2006. Over this timeframe, this category experienced the largest proportional surge at 405%. As a consequence of this rapid escalation, total injuries followed an almost identical upward pattern, multiplying more than fourfold from 864 to a high of 3,912 in 2004–2005, before closing at 3,821—an overall increase of 342%.

In contrast, the figures for more severe injuries were considerably lower throughout the timeframe. Serious injuries climbed steadily year-on-year from 162 in 1998–1999 to 476 by 2005–2006, representing an overall increase of 194%. Meanwhile, fatal injuries remained the smallest category, starting at 49 and peaking at 95 cases in 2001–2002 before fluctuating downwards. Despite dropping back to 49 in 2005–2006, fatal casualties finished slightly higher at 58 in the final year (2006–2007), marking a modest overall rise of 18%.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response8.0
Coherence and Cohesion7.5
Lexical Resource7.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy8.0
Overall8.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 8.0

The student provides a very clear and accurate overview of the main features and trends in the table. All three injury categories are properly addressed, with appropriate comparisons made regarding their scale and percentage growth. For instance, the student correctly highlights that slight injuries experienced by far the steepest growth at 405% and consistently accounted for the vast majority of total casualties, while fatal injuries remained the least common. Data points are cited accurately to support the claims, such as the peak of 3,424 in 2004–2005 for minor incidents and the overall rise of 194% for serious injuries. The information is fully grounded in the provided visual data, demonstrating a complete understanding of the prompt requirements.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.5

The essay is exceptionally well-structured and easy to follow. Ideas are logically sequenced, beginning with a clear introduction, followed by an overarching summary paragraph, and then well-organised body paragraphs separating minor incidents from more severe injuries. Paragraphing is used appropriately to group related data. Cohesive devices are handled skillfully and naturally without being obtrusive, using transitional phrases like 'Furthermore', 'Regarding minor incidents', 'As a consequence', and 'In contrast' to establish clear relationships between ideas and maintain a smooth progression throughout the response.

Lexical Resource: Band 7.5

The student demonstrates a wide and flexible vocabulary range suited to an Academic Task 1 response. Less common lexical items and collocations are used effectively and naturally, such as 'categorised by severity', 'upward trend', 'steepest growth', 'proportional surge', and 'fluctuating downwards'. Word choice and phrasing are precise ('multiplying more than fourfold', 'modest overall rise'), and there are no noticeable errors in spelling, word formation, or collocation. The vocabulary choices significantly enhance the clarity and sophistication of the report.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 8.0

The response features a wide range of complex grammatical structures used with a high degree of accuracy and control. The majority of sentences are error-free. The student successfully employs subordinate clauses, participial phrases ('alongside the overall percentage growth', 'marking a modest overall rise'), and varied past-tense constructions to report historical data effectively. Punctuation is handled flawlessly to break up long sentences and introduce lists or contrasts. Grammatical control is exceptionally strong throughout, justifying a top-tier band score.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.