Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-09-29

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The supplied table described the average of deadly, critical and minor wounds outcomng from pistol and blade crime in GreatBritain between 1998 to 2007 moreover, the ratio inclined for every injury above the period.

As an overall trend, in the begning years the rate of crime wounds was very low but, with years it was begin to rose swiftly. Moreover, most of theinjuries were done in the given second last year after this its ratio was slightly declined.

In the starting year, the numbers of total injuries were 864. In which fatal injuries were 49 but the serious injuries were more than these injuries and its value were 162. In the last slight wounds were 653.In the next year, number of all injuries was 1195 which was greater than the previous one. In it fatal injuries were 62 , serious were 200 and slight were 933.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response fails to meet the minimum word count requirement of 150 words, coming in at 146 words. While the student attempts to provide an overview and mentions some initial data points from the table, the coverage of the main features is incomplete. The text stops abruptly after detailing only the first two years of data (1998-1999 and 1999-2000), completely omitting the rest of the timeline up to 2007 and the overall percentage increases provided in the table. Consequently, key comparisons and trends across the full period are missing. This limited and truncated approach significantly impacts task fulfillment.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The essay attempts a logical structure by starting with an introduction and overview sentence, followed by body details. However, paragraphing is underdeveloped, and the transition between sentences is frequently clumsy or mechanical (e.g., 'moreover, the ratio inclined', 'In the starting year... In the next year'). The referencing is sometimes unclear, and the overall progression breaks down because the text abruptly halts after just two years of data. Cohesive devices are used awkwardly, leading to disjointed reading and a lack of cohesive flow throughout the short response.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is very limited and contains numerous non-standard word choices and spelling errors. Examples include 'deadly' instead of fatal, 'outcomng' (outcoming) instead of resulting, 'inclined' instead of increased, 'begning' instead of beginning, and 'theinjuries'. While the student attempts some less common synonyms, inaccurate collocations and persistent spelling mistakes (e.g., 'rose' used incorrectly as 'to rose') impede communication and reflect a restricted lexical range appropriate for academic tasks.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.0

The response demonstrates a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying primarily on simple sentences with frequent structural errors. There are multiple tense and form errors, such as 'The supplied table described' (should be present tense 'describes'), 'it was begin to rose swiftly' (incorrect auxiliary and infinitive usage), and 'its value were' (subject-verb agreement error with plural/singular nouns). Punctuation is also weak, with missing commas and run-on structures. These frequent errors cause difficulty for the reader and restrict the grammar score to a lower band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.