Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The presented table displays information about three various physical harms including fetal, serious and slight which were outcomes of knife and gun offences in Britian in between 1998 and 2007. And also depicts the the incrsease in their proportion rate in each degree with passage of time.

Overall, it can be witnessed that the group of slight injuries recored most amongst the three in each year, while fetal Sprain were less.However their percentage increase with modest in serious.

To begin with, it can be seen that in 1998 to1999 the numbers of fetal body harm were 49, while the the 162 serious and 653 slight injuries were noticed with total number 864. In next year 2000, the cases increased for each section counting 62 fetal 200 serious and 933 slight accidents. however the sum of them was 1195. in adittion to this, from 2000 to the crime cases continue to soared which result in more physical damages accounting 1382 in 2001 and 1877 in 2002.

Secondly ,by 2002 to 2003 80 fetal injuries were recorded with 416 serious and

1883 slight. and in total 2179. Furthermore, from 2003 to 2004 the number of fetal cases were dropped to 68 with 437 serious and 18862 slight. Moreover it climped uo in next two years from 2004 to 2005. but by 2006 to 2007 only fetal injuries were occured. However 18 % fetal and 194 % serious and 405 sligt injuries increase with time.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response attempts to address the prompt by reporting information from the table, but it only partially covers the data. While it touches on the categories of injuries, it misinterprets key terminology throughout the text, referring to fatal injuries as fetal or sprain. Furthermore, the selection of data is fragmented and lists raw numbers mechanically without providing a clear, overarching summary of the main trends. The overview is weak, attempting to state general patterns but containing confusing phrasing and factual inaccuracies regarding which figures were highest. To reach a higher level, the response needs to accurately identify the data categories, select key features rather than listing isolated figures, and provide a fully developed overview of the main trends across the decade.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The text is organized into paragraphs, but there is a lack of clear overall progression and logical linking between ideas. Cohesive devices are used awkwardly or repetitively, such as the mechanical sequencing with phrases like 'To begin with', 'Secondly', and 'Furthermore'. Referencing is sometimes unclear, making it difficult for the reader to follow the flow of information. Paragraphing is attempted, but internal paragraph structure lacks unity and clear thematic focus. To improve, the writer should ensure smooth transitions between sentences, use cohesive devices more naturally, and structure paragraphs so that each focuses on a distinct, logically developed aspect of the data.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is very limited and contains frequent word choice and spelling errors that impede communication. Throughout the text, the writer misuses key terms, such as writing 'fetal' and 'Sprain' instead of 'fatal', and misspelling words like 'Britian', 'incrsease', 'recored', 'adittion', 'climped', and 'ouccured'. There is little evidence of less common lexical items, and the repetitive reliance on basic phrasing restricts the quality of the response. To progress, the student needs to learn correct terminology for data description, improve basic spelling, and expand their range of vocabulary to discuss trends and statistics more precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response displays a limited range of grammatical structures, and the attempts at complex sentences frequently contain errors. There are frequent mistakes in basic grammar, including article omission, incorrect prepositions (e.g., 'in between', 'with passage of time'), and flawed subject-verb agreement or tense consistency. Punctuation errors are also noticeable, such as erratic spacing around punctuation marks and incomplete sentence structures. To achieve a higher band, the writer must improve control over basic sentence construction, ensure accurate use of verb tenses when describing past data, and reduce the frequency of grammatical errors that cause difficulty for the reader.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.