Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The table illustrates the count of fatal, serious and slight injuries coutcomes from gun and knife crime in great britain from 1998 to 2007 as well as the highly ratio of every degree of injury over the decade.

Overall , in great britain fatal increased in middle of period as well as lower in starting year. In hence , serious gun and knife crime rose to in past few year and decresed in first history. Moreover, slight crime incresed in last over the period as well as down in starting year.

To begin with, crime statistics in 1998 - 1999 fatal around 49 , serious about 162 also slight of 653 and total of all data is 864. in [redacted phone] degree of injury fatal is 62 , serious is 200 and slight is 933 plus, 1195 is total. in [redacted phone] 72,244,1066 is information of fatal,serious,slight. Furthermore, [redacted phone] is approx double of [redacted phone].

To dig more, [redacted phone] year 68 is fatal,437 is serious as well as 1862 is slight crime of gun and knife and all total is 2367.However , [redacted phone] fatal increse around 77 lower in serious approxmately 411 and 3424 is slight. Lastely, crime is decrese.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You identify the table’s subject and include several accurate figures, such as 49 fatal injuries, 162 serious injuries and 653 slight injuries in 1998–99, and the total of 2,367 in 2003–04. However, the overview is unclear and does not accurately summarise the main pattern: slight injuries rose sharply, while fatal injuries fluctuated and serious injuries generally increased through 2005–06. The claim that serious injuries “decreased in first history” is not supported, and “2002–2003 is approx double” does not specify what is being compared. The final years are also inadequately reported: the response says only “crime is decrease,” without giving the 2005–06 figures or explaining that later category data are unavailable. Select and compare the key trends more clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has separate opening, overview and detail paragraphs, and phrases such as “To begin with” and “Furthermore” show an attempt to guide the reader. However, the progression is difficult to follow because the figures are presented as a sequence rather than grouped into meaningful trends or comparisons. The overview’s statements about increases and decreases are vague, and the final paragraph ends abruptly with “Lastly, crime is decrease.” Some linking expressions are used inaccurately or mechanically, including “In hence” and “To dig more,” while punctuation spacing and transitions such as “2367.However” interrupt the flow. Organise the details by injury type or by notable changes, and use clear references to connect each comparison to the relevant years.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “total” and “degree of injury,” so the reader can recognise the topic. However, the range is basic and several word choices or collocations make the meaning unclear, such as “highly ratio,” “fatal increased in middle of period,” and “slight crime.” There are also noticeable spelling and word-form errors, including “coutcomes,” “great britain,” “decresed,” “incresed” and “Lastely.” These errors sometimes strain the reader’s understanding, particularly in the overview. Use precise terms such as “number of injuries,” “proportion,” “rose” and “fell,” and check spelling and capitalization before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts both simple statements and longer sentences with connectors, but sentence structures are limited and errors are frequent enough to make several claims difficult to interpret. For example, “Overall, in great britain fatal increased in middle of period” lacks a clear grammatical subject and article, while “serious gun and knife crime rose to in past few year” has an incomplete verb pattern. Tense and agreement are also inconsistent, as in “crime is decrease,” and punctuation is often poorly controlled, including missing spaces after full stops. Build accurate simple sentences first—for example, “Fatal injuries rose to 95 in 2001–02, then fell”—before adding more complex comparisons. Check articles, verb forms and sentence boundaries.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.