Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table depicts the information about the number of fatal, serious and minor injuries caused by gun and knife crime which had happened between the tenure starting from 1998 to 2007 with an increase in the percentage for each degree of injury.

In [redacted phone], the total number of injuries was 864, consisting of 49 fatal, 162 serious and 653 slight injuries. The figure increased stealdily over the preciding years, reaching 1195 in [redacted phone] and 1382 in [redacted phone]. The total continued to rise and reached to 1877 in [redacted phone] and 2179 in [redacted phone]. A significant increase was recored in [redacted phone] reaching at 3912 injuries. Then after that there is a slight decrease in the period [redacted phone] to 3821 injuries. At the end, in the year [redacted phone] there is an huge reduction in the injuries which shows no serious or slight injuries happened in that period and only 58 fatal injuries were reported.

In conclusion, the number of fatal injuries generally increased from 49 in 1998–1999 to a peak of 95 in 2001–2002. After that, it fluctuated, falling to 49 in 2005–2006 before rising to 58 in 2006–2007. Overall, slight injuries accounted for the largest proportion throughout the period.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response includes relevant figures and identifies the broad rise in total injuries, the later fall, and the dominance of slight injuries. However, the overview is incomplete and some reporting is inaccurate, which limits how fully the table is summarised. Most importantly, the statement that no serious or slight injuries occurred in 2006–2007 is unsupported: those entries are shown as dashes, so their values are unavailable, not zero. The total of 2,179 is also assigned to 2003–2004, although it belongs to 2002–2003; the 2003–2004 total is 2,367. The response gives little account of the percentage increases or the serious-injury trend. A clearer overview and careful selection of accurate comparisons would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a generally coherent sequence: it begins with the earliest total, follows the overall figures through time, and ends with comments on fatal and slight injuries. Paragraphing also separates the main chronological account from the concluding observations. Linking expressions such as “Then after that” and “At the end” help signal progression, although some are repetitive or awkward, and the conclusion partly repeats information already given. The movement between total injuries and fatal injuries is not always clearly signposted, so the focus can feel abrupt. To improve, organise the body around the overall total trend and the injury categories, using clearer transitions to show how each comparison relates to the overview.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

There is enough vocabulary to describe the table, including “consisting of,” “significant increase,” “fluctuated,” and “largest proportion.” The writer also uses several relevant terms for trends, though some choices are imprecise or unnatural: “minor injuries” is less consistent with the table’s label “slight,” and “tenure” does not suit a time period. Spelling errors such as “stealdily,” “preciding,” and “recored” are noticeable, while phrases such as “reaching at” and “huge reduction” are not well controlled for this formal report. Aim for accurate, conventional collocations and check spelling carefully. More precise vocabulary would help distinguish a rise, a peak, a decline, and unavailable data.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response uses a mixture of simple and longer sentence forms, including a relative clause in “which shows no serious or slight injuries happened” and a concluding sentence with a time comparison. Meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “reached to 1877” and “reaching at 3912” use incorrect prepositions, while “there is an huge reduction” has an article error and an awkward shift in tense. The opening sentence is also difficult to control because several ideas are packed into one structure. Use past-tense forms consistently when describing the historical data, and practise accurate article and preposition patterns. Breaking the opening into clearer clauses would improve control without sacrificing sentence variety.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.