Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.0)

The table cleary illustrate the fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 nad percentage incread each with degree of injuries over the period.

From 1998 to 2007 there are many incidents happend that has been increasing from the beginig year it has in 3 categories fatl ,serious and slight.

Overall from 1998 to 1999 total injuries were 864 slight as in top 653 follow by serious a62 and fatal was 49.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response3.0
Coherence and Cohesion3.5
Lexical Resource4.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy4.5
Overall4.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0

The response identifies the topic and includes one accurate starting-year figure: 864 total injuries, including 653 slight and 49 fatal cases. However, it does not summarise the table’s main features or make meaningful comparisons across the years. The claim that incidents increased from the beginning is too general and misses the later decline in the total from 3,912 in 2004–05 to 3,821 in 2005–06; it also overlooks the substantial increases in slight and serious injuries. The figures are presented unclearly, and “a62” does not accurately report the 162 serious injuries. The response is only 64 words, below the required 150. Include a clear overview and select key trends and comparisons to develop.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 3.5

There is a basic attempt to organise the response: the opening introduces the table, and the following sentences refer to trends and then the first year’s figures. However, the ideas do not progress into a complete summary, and the final sentence stops after describing 1998–99. Linking is limited, with “Overall” not introducing an actual overview, while “as in top” makes the relationship between the figures difficult to follow. The categories and numbers would be clearer if grouped in a logical order and connected with accurate comparison phrases. Use separate paragraphs for an overview and the main details, and ensure each sentence develops a distinct point.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some relevant task vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “categories” and “percentage,” so the subject is generally recognisable. However, the range is narrow and several spelling and word-choice errors reduce clarity: “cleary,” “incread,” “happend” and “beginig” are misspelled, while “incidents happend” is an imprecise way to describe the injury figures. “As in top” is also not an appropriate expression for comparing values. Build a more accurate range for describing data, such as “the number of injuries,” “accounted for,” “rose,” and “reached a peak.” Check spelling carefully and choose phrases that express comparisons precisely.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts simple sentence forms and uses a time phrase, “From 1998 to 2007,” but grammatical control is inconsistent. In “The table cleary illustrate,” the subject requires a singular verb (“illustrates”), and the opening sentence lacks a clear grammatical connection between the table’s contents and the percentage increase. “There are many incidents happend” combines an unsuitable verb form with an unclear construction; a more accurate form would be “the number of injuries increased.” The final sentence also has an incomplete comparison structure, particularly in “slight as in top follow by serious.” Use straightforward, complete sentences first, checking subject–verb agreement, verb forms and punctuation before attempting longer structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.