Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table gives us information about various types of injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in great britain in a period of 9 years from 1998 to 2007 and aslo ilusstrate the overall increase for each kind of crime.

overall the table shows that there is increase in injuries over the passage of time where the slight injuries are at the highest level all over the period and fatal injuries are at the lowest level.

In year 1998 fatal injuries was recorded 49 whcich then shows the upward trend till year 2007 and the total percentage was 18 .Serious injuries give a number of 162 in a starting year also show a general upward trend and reaches to its highest level in 2006 while there was no single seroius ijuries recorded in year 2007.Followed by slight injuries starting from 653 in intial period of the table and shows a dramatic increase with almost reaches to more then 5 times by the end of the period .

we can see the largest amount of percentage increase in slight injuires over the period of time followed by the seriuos demages and fatal is at the lowest level.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main pattern: slight injuries were the most numerous, fatal injuries the least numerous, and the overall figures generally rose. You also report the percentage increases, correctly noting that slight injuries had the largest rise and fatal injuries the smallest. However, some details are inaccurate or unclear. Fatal injuries did not rise steadily to 2007: they peaked at 95 in 2001–02, fell to 49 in 2005–06, then reached 58 in 2006–07. The claim that slight injuries became “more than 5 times” their initial level is not supported by the final available figure, 3,296, which is about five times 653. The missing 2006–07 figures for serious and slight injuries also need to be distinguished from zero. A clearer overview and more precise comparisons would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and a paragraph describing the injury categories, followed by a concluding comparison. This gives the reader a general route through the information. However, the progression within the body is sometimes difficult to follow because several categories and trends are packed into one long paragraph. Linking phrases such as “Followed by” do not form a complete transition, and the final sentence repeats the overview rather than adding a distinct comparison. Referencing is also occasionally unclear, particularly “the total percentage,” which could refer to more than one figure. Separate the categories into clearer groups and use precise links between the figures and their time periods to make the organisation more effective.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “upward trend,” “dramatic increase,” “highest level,” and “percentage increase,” which helps communicate the broad patterns. However, the range and control are limited by repeated general terms such as “increase” and “level,” as well as inaccurate or unnatural choices such as “overall increase for each kind of crime” when the table reports injuries. Spelling errors—including “great britain,” “aslo,” “ilusstrate,” and “seroius”—are noticeable and can distract the reader. Some phrases, such as “serious damages,” do not accurately describe the table’s injury categories. Aim for precise terms such as “number of injuries,” “rose,” “fell,” and “accounted for,” and check spelling and collocations carefully.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, for example, “where the slight injuries are at the highest level” and the sentence comparing fatal, serious, and slight injuries. However, some grammatical errors make relationships between ideas unclear. Examples include “In year 1998 fatal injuries was recorded 49,” where the subject and verb do not agree and the sentence structure is incomplete, and “Serious injuries give a number of 162 … also show,” which shifts tense and lacks a clear grammatical connection. Articles and prepositions are also often missing, as in “in a starting year.” Punctuation is inconsistent, with missing spaces after full stops and commas. Use past-tense reporting consistently and build shorter, complete sentences around each comparison.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.