Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table illustrates about the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from knife and gun crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007.

Overall, it could be seen that majority of injuries can be seen in the year [redacted phone] with total of 3912 before declining. Slight injuries accounted for the largest number of injuries while the fatal injuries recorded consistently the least common.

In [redacted phone] there were only 49 fatal injuries,162 serious injuries and 653 slight injuries, giving a total of 864. The figure rose over the following period, with the total reaching 2367 in the [redacted phone]. Although the figure for fatal injuries fluctuated, serious injuries had general increase, while the slight injuries with 1862. By [redacted phone] it had its peak stage in this year with the total of 3912, serious injuries with 411, fatal injuries are 77.

In the final year, the total number of injuries fell slightly to 3821 in [redacted phone], before decreasing further in [redacted phone]. Regard the percentage increase slight injuries experienced the greatest rise with 405, whereas for serious and fatal with 194% and 18% with the total of 342 at the end of three categories.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You provide a relevant overview, identifying that slight injuries were the most numerous and fatal injuries the least common, and you report several key figures accurately, including the 1998–99 total and the 2004–05 peak. The response also notes the subsequent fall and gives the percentage increases. However, some details are incomplete or unclear: the 2003–04 discussion gives the slight-injury figure but does not clearly state the serious-injury figure, and the final-year statement says the total decreased further even though no total is provided for 2006–07. The table shows only 58 fatal injuries for that year. Clarify that the later-year category totals are unavailable, and explain the overall rise more precisely to make the main features fully clear.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, an overview, and paragraphs describing the figures over time. This makes the information generally easy to follow, and sequencing expressions such as “In 1998-1999,” “By 2004-2005,” and “In the final year” help guide the reader. Cohesion is less successful in places because some links are mechanical or the references are unclear. For example, “Although the figure for fatal injuries fluctuated, serious injuries had general increase, while the slight injuries with 1862” does not form a complete, connected comparison. The final sentence also combines several percentage figures awkwardly. Use complete sentences and clearer links between each category and its figures to improve progression.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a suitable range of task-related vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “fluctuated,” “declining,” and “percentage increase.” These terms allow you to describe the table’s categories and broad trends. However, several word choices and collocations are unnatural or imprecise, such as “about the number,” “the largest number of injuries,” and “peak stage.” The phrase “Regard the percentage increase” is also not idiomatic, and “with the total of 342 at the end of three categories” makes the intended comparison difficult to understand. Aim for concise, conventional reporting language—for example, “the number of,” “reached a peak,” and “regarding percentage increases”—and check that each phrase expresses the intended data relationship.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including a contrast clause beginning “Although” and a time clause with “before.” The main trends and many figures remain understandable, but some grammatical errors recur and occasionally make relationships unclear. Examples include “it could be seen that majority” (missing an article), “with total of 3912,” and “serious injuries had general increase.” The sentence beginning “Although the figure for fatal injuries fluctuated” is incomplete at “while the slight injuries with 1862,” and the final sentence has an unclear structure around the percentage figures. Check articles and verb forms, and ensure every clause has a complete subject and verb. More accurate sentence construction would let your comparisons come through clearly.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.