Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The given table chart illustrate information about great britain - gun and knife crime statistics -1998 - 2007 . The chart compares different categories and presents the data in number or percentages .

Overall, it is clear that there are noticeable among the categories shown in the chart . In addition , some categories shows some fluctucations increment as well as decrement wheares for some cases they remain stable .

According to the chart , the first main activities years / degree of injury [redacted phone] : Fatel 49 / Serious 162/ Slight 653 / Total 864 percentages , which them following by second activities [redacted phone] : Fatel 62 / serious 162/ slight 653 / Tatal percentage 1195 , come then [redacted phone] : Fatel 72 / serious 244 / slight 1066 / Tatal degree of injuary over the percentage 1382 , [redacted phone] ; Fatel 95 / serious 392 / slight 1390 / Total 1877 percent . [redacted phone] Fetal 80 / serious 416 /slight 1683 / and total percentage 2179 . All these complete the data almost half the total procdure .

Let have a look remaining information , the last activities [redacted phone] ; Fetal 68 , serious 437 / slight 1862 / Total injuary percentages 2367 , [redacted phone] Fetal 58 / serious - / slight - / total percent 0 , At the end of percentages increase 98/99-2005/06 or 06/07 ; Fetal 18 / serious 194 / slight 405 / and the total percentages 342. Furthermore , all the data suggest that there are not stability in all the activities .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response identifies the table’s subject and attempts to report figures across several years, but it does not give a clear, accurate overview of the main trends. The statement that categories fluctuate or remain stable is vague, and the claim that there is “not stability in all the activities” does not summarise the key pattern: slight injuries and the total generally rose sharply, while fatal injuries varied. Several figures are misreported: for 1999–2000, serious and slight injuries are given as 162 and 653 instead of 200 and 933; the 2005–2006 and 2004–2005 data are largely omitted, and 2006–2007 dashes are incorrectly treated as a total of zero. The percentage increases are included, but not interpreted. Select the main trends and compare them accurately.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is a basic attempt to organise the response into an introduction, an overview and two detail paragraphs. Phrases such as “According to the chart” and “Let have a look remaining information” signal a move between sections, and the figures are broadly presented in chronological order. However, progression is difficult to follow because the response lists many values in long, punctuation-heavy sequences, while labels such as “first main activities” and “total percentage” do not clarify how the data relate. The final paragraph also jumps from 2003–2004 to 2006–2007, omitting intervening years. Use clear topic sentences and group related trends, rather than listing every figure; accurate referencing and more purposeful linking would make the organisation easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some task-related vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “fluctuations,” and “percentage increase,” so the reader can recognise the subject matter. However, vocabulary is often repetitive or inaccurately chosen, and several errors strain understanding. “The first main activities years” and “total injury percentages” are not natural ways to describe the table, while “activities” is repeatedly used where “years” or “figures” is intended. Spelling errors such as “Fatel,” “fluctucations,” “wheares,” and “injuary” further reduce clarity. Aim for precise reporting language, for example “the number of injuries,” “rose,” “fell,” and “accounted for,” and check spelling and collocations before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts both simple statements and longer sentences, including “Overall, it is clear that…” and “Furthermore, all the data suggest…”. However, grammatical control is weak across much of the writing, and errors frequently make relationships between figures unclear. For example, “The given table chart illustrate” has incorrect agreement and an awkward noun structure; “some categories shows” also has subject–verb disagreement. Sentence boundaries and punctuation are unreliable, especially in the long data lists, and phrases such as “which them following by second activities” do not form a clear grammatical clause. Build shorter, complete sentences around comparisons, and check agreement, articles and verb forms. For instance: “Fatal injuries rose from 49 in 1998–1999 to 95 in 2001–2002, before falling.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.