Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-14

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.5)

the graph illustrates Gun and knife crime statistics in great britain from 1998 to 2007.

overall the fatal injury rates were relatively low total 18 percent increase over he period 1998 to 2007 while serious injuries remains high over the period as compare to fatal with 194 percent rise while slight injuries were on the top with a 405 percent rise.

the fatal injuries rise from 1998 to 2002 from 49 per year cases to 95 which was highest in fatal a,mong the years then its ratio fell slowly in 2003 from 95 to 80 and then at the 2007 eventually down to 58 injuries per year.

however the ratio of serious injuries remained high from 1998 to 2005 from 168 to 437 then the next year it slightly became low 411 and again rise to 476 in 2006 .

Furthermore the slight injuries remained continuosly high over the years with from 864 in 1999 to 3821 in 2006 with a 342% incread rate.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.0
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the broad pattern that injuries increased overall and compare the percentage rises for fatal, serious and slight injuries. You also select useful turning points, such as fatal injuries peaking at 95 in 2001–02 and serious injuries reaching 476 in 2005–06. However, some figures and descriptions are inaccurate: serious injuries began at 162, not 168, and the slight-injury figures are 653 in 1998–99 and 3,296 in 2005–06, rather than 864 and 3,821, which are totals. The overview also says serious injuries “remains high” without clearly summarising their trend. To strengthen the response, distinguish injury categories from the total column and give a clearer overview of the main changes.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview and paragraphs describing the injury categories. Sequencing is generally understandable, and transitions such as “however” and “Furthermore” help signal changes of focus. At times, though, the progression is weakened by unclear references and comparisons. For example, “with from 864 in 1999 to 3821 in 2006” does not make clear that these are total figures, while “then the next year” requires the reader to infer which year is meant. The overview also combines several comparisons in one long sentence. Use clearer topic sentences, group related figures consistently, and make each comparison explicit to improve the flow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for describing data, including “increase,” “rise,” “fell,” “highest” and “percentage,” so the main trends are usually understandable. However, some word choices and collocations are imprecise or repetitive: “injury rates” and “ratio of serious injuries” are not suitable descriptions of the counts in this table, and “remained continuously high” is vague. Spelling errors such as “continuosly” and “incread” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise terms such as “number of injuries,” “figure” and “proportion,” and vary trend language only when it accurately reflects the data. This would make the account clearer and more natural.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentences, including clauses linked with “while,” “then” and “as.” However, grammatical control is uneven, and errors sometimes make relationships between figures difficult to follow. Examples include “the fatal injury rates were relatively low total 18 percent increase,” where the sentence needs a clearer structure, and “serious injuries remains high,” where the verb does not agree with the plural subject. Tense and sentence construction are also problematic in “then its ratio fell slowly … and then at the 2007 eventually down to 58.” Practise forming complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, and check agreement, articles and punctuation. More accurate control of these patterns would make your comparisons easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.