Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The table represent the number of fatal, serious and slight damages outcoming from wepons and kinfe crime in great british in the time period of almost one decades.

It is noticeable that, the number of slight crime was higher in overall preiod while that of, there was also have lowest crime called fatal.

Looking at the figure, the number crimes held by guns and knife as caterogries like fatal, serious and slight in great britain. In the beginning,the number of slight crime was topped of the table in over the period by 4050 units . After that, serious injury is the second top injury held by gun and knife crime by around 3000 units.

Furthermore, the number of fatal injury is minimum by around 400 units in overall the time period . Later the percentage of the injury is miximum on slight by 405 units while that of, the percentage of damage is below in fatal by 18 units. At last, the overall total number of injuryis higher in [redacted phone] by 3821 units.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The response identifies two valid broad features: slight injuries were the most numerous, while fatal injuries were the least numerous, and it notes that the percentage increase was greatest for slight injuries. However, the account is only minimally developed and several comparisons misrepresent the table. The claim that slight injuries led “by 4050 units” is not supported: 405 is their percentage increase, not a difference in injury counts. Likewise, serious injuries did not rise by “around 3000 units,” and the fatal total was not “around 400” across the period. The final total of 3,821 is correctly linked to 2005–06, but the table’s highest total is 3,912 in 2004–05. Select a few accurate figures and describe the overall rise and later fluctuation clearly.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

There is a basic attempt to organise the response, moving from an introduction to general observations and then to details, with linking expressions such as “Furthermore” and “At last.” However, the progression is difficult to follow because the paragraphs do not develop a clear comparison, and several statements repeat the same broad points about injury categories and percentages. Connections between ideas are also unclear: “After that” does not identify a time or a change, while “while that of” leaves the comparison unfinished. The response would be clearer if it used a concise overview followed by a paragraph describing the figures over time and another comparing the percentage increases. Use linking words only where the relationship between the facts is explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The response uses some task-related vocabulary, including “fatal,” “serious,” “slight,” “percentage,” and “overall,” so the reader can recognise the subject. However, the range is basic and repetitive, and inaccurate word choices often make the intended meaning hard to interpret. “Slight crime” and “fatal injury” are not used consistently to describe the table’s injury categories, while “damage outcoming” and “injury is miximum” are unclear or unnatural. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “wepons,” “kinfe,” “caterogries,” and “preiod.” Aim for precise terms such as “injuries,” “figures,” “rose,” and “accounted for,” and check spelling before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts a few longer structures, for example “It is noticeable that…” and “while that of…,” but these are often incomplete or inaccurately formed. Errors occur frequently in basic sentence construction and agreement: “The table represent” needs a plural subject with a matching verb, and “there was also have lowest crime” combines incompatible verb forms. Articles and sentence boundaries are also unreliable, as in “in the time period of almost one decades” and the comma after “noticeable that.” These problems sometimes obscure the relationships between the data. Build accuracy first with clear simple sentences, then add controlled comparisons using forms such as “while” and “whereas.” Check subject–verb agreement, verb forms, articles, and punctuation in each sentence.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.