Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Momentum Workout · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table shows the number of fatal, serious and slight injuries resulting from gun and knife crime in Great Britain from 1998 to 2007 and the percentage increase for each degree of injury over the period.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Great Britain - Gun and Knife Crime statistics - 1998-2007

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The given chart gives information about the crimes committed using guns and knife between year 1998 till 2007 in great Britain.

Overall, we can observed the crime rate increased as the time increased. However, there were less fatal crashes compared to the slight crashes throughout the decade.

To begin with, in year 1998 the total number of crashes happened were 864. This eventually kept on increasing every year passed. By the year 2006, it almost went almost 3and a half times of the original number of crimes in the initial year. For year 2007, the total crime rate remained stable at 3821.

Secondly, the highest number of fatal crime recorded was in year 2002, and the lowest number recorded was same in year 1999 and 2006. Thich means that fatal crash started to drop after 2002 and came to 49, but again rose to 59 by 2007. Furthermore, serious crime reports were highest at 476 cases in year 2006 and 2007, which were at 162 in the initial year.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the broad rise in the total and note that slight injuries were more numerous than fatal ones, which are relevant features. However, the overview is too general and some key details are inaccurate or unclear. The total did not increase every year: it fell from 3,912 in 2004–05 to 3,821 in 2005–06, and no total is provided for 2006–07, so saying it remained stable in 2007 is unsupported. The peak in fatal injuries was 95 in 2001–02, not 2002, and the serious-injury figure of 476 applies to 2005–06; the table gives no serious figure for 2006–07. Select the main trends accurately and compare the categories with specific, correctly attributed data.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and two detail paragraphs. Sequencing phrases such as “To begin with” and “Secondly” help signal the move between points. However, progression is not consistently clear because the first detail paragraph shifts from totals to an unsupported claim about 2007, while the second combines fatal and serious injuries without a clear comparison. Some linking is mechanical, and “This means” does not clearly identify which preceding figure it refers to. Group the information by meaningful trends—for example, totals and slight injuries together, then fatal and serious injuries—and use references that make each comparison explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some task-related vocabulary, including “total number,” “fatal,” “serious,” and “increased,” so the reader can generally identify the categories being discussed. However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for describing this table. “Crashes” is repeatedly used for recorded injuries or crimes, and “crime rate” suggests a rate rather than a count. Phrases such as “the total number of crashes happened” and “went almost 3and a half times” are awkward, while “Thich” is a spelling error. Use precise terms such as “injuries,” “incidents,” and “the total rose to,” and vary reporting verbs and comparison language.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a few longer structures, including “By the year 2006, it almost went…” and “which were at 162 in the initial year,” but most sentences rely on simple patterns, and errors recur in basic grammar. Examples include “we can observed” instead of “we can observe,” “between year 1998 till 2007,” and “the highest number … was in year 2002,” where articles and prepositions are missing or misused. “There were less fatal crashes” also has an agreement/form issue, and the sentence about the serious cases has an unclear relative clause. These errors sometimes make relationships between figures difficult to follow. Practise accurate past-tense reporting and build comparisons with controlled clauses, such as “Fatal injuries peaked at … before falling to …”.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.